2003•Classics in Transport AnalysisRequires access

THE USEFULNESS OF TRAVEL BUDGETS. IN: URBAN TRANSPORT

P B Goodwin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Many researchers have found the idea of a constant outlay on travel a magnetic hypothesis. If true, it would provide a useful touchstone to test the reliability of existing transport models and a constraint to improve them. This paper has five parts. First, a number of ways are investigated in which a known travel budget could be incorporated into the generation, mode choice, or distribution parts of current models. Secondly, there is a discussion of some implications of doing this on policy evaluation. Thirdly, consideration is given to some of the difficulties in interpreting empirical work on this subject, to judge whether inferences that have been drawn on stability of travel budgets are supported. Fourthly. Some theoretical problems are raised, particularly relating to the behavioral implications of stable budget assumptions. Lastly, some general conclusions are drawn. It is suggested that we are likely to learn most about travel behavior, mobility and the effect of alternative policies if the time and money allocated to travel are treated as variables and not behavioral constants. These outlays are likely to be influenced in particular by travel opportunities and costs, as well as various socio-economic and personal characteristics.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Many researchers have found the idea of a constant outlay on travel a magnetic hypothesis. If true, it would provide a useful touchstone to test the reliability of existing transport models and a constraint to improve them. This paper has five parts. First, a number of ways are investigated in which a known travel budget could be incorporated into the generation, mode choice, or distribution parts of current models. Secondly, there is a discussion of some implications of doing this on policy evaluation. Thirdly, consideration is given to some of the difficulties in interpreting empirical work on this subject, to judge whether inferences that have been drawn on stability of travel budgets are supported. Fourthly. Some theoretical problems are raised, particularly relating to the behavioral implications of stable budget assumptions. Lastly, some general conclusions are drawn. It is suggested that we are likely to learn most about travel behavior, mobility and the effect of alternative policies if the time and money allocated to travel are treated as variables and not behavioral constants. These outlays are likely to be influenced in particular by travel opportunities and costs, as well as various socio-economic and personal characteristics.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Many researchers have found the idea of a constant outlay on travel a magnetic hypothesis. If true, it would provide a useful touchstone to test the reliability of existing transport models and a constraint to improve them. This paper has five parts. First, a number of ways are investigated in which a known travel budget could be incorporated into the generation, mode choice, or distribution parts of current models. Secondly, there is a discussion of some implications of doing this on policy evaluation. Thirdly, consideration is given to some of the difficulties in interpreting empirical work on this subject, to judge whether inferences that have been drawn on stability of travel budgets are supported. Fourthly. Some theoretical problems are raised, particularly relating to the behavioral implications of stable budget assumptions. Lastly, some general conclusions are drawn. It is suggested that we are likely to learn most about travel behavior, mobility and the effect of alternative policies if the time and money allocated to travel are treated as variables and not behavioral constants. These outlays are likely to be influenced in particular by travel opportunities and costs, as well as various socio-economic and personal characteristics.

Key concepts: Travel behavior, Budget constraint, Constraint (computer-aided design), Work (physics), Mode choice, Economics, Distribution (mathematics), Econometrics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
THE USEFULNESS OF TRAVEL BUDGETS. IN: URBAN TRANSPORT — Research Paper | ScholarLens