2015University of Birmingham Institutional Research Archive (University of Birmingham)Open access

LEARNING TO ACT AS A TEAM: DEVELOPMENTAL ONSET, UNDERLYING PROCESSES AND PRE-REQUISITES OF CO-REPRESENTATION IN EARLY CHILDHOOD

Sophie J. Milward

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Co-representation has been argued to be a mechanism in adult joint action that allows participants in a joint task to co-ordinate their actions with a partner. Substantial evidence for this mechanism has come from tasks such as the joint Simon task (Sebanz, Knoblich & Prinz, 2003), which show interference from a partner’s task on one’s own performance. The following studies aim to use this mechanism as a measure of children’s joint action abilities and a way of directly comparing adult and child behaviours. Chapter 1 presents three studies which suggest a developmental onset of co-representation effects at around 4 years old. Chapter 2 attempts to uncover what type of representations may be formed in joint tasks at this age. Chapter 3 presents an individual differences study, suggesting that both Inhibitory Control and explicit Theory of Mind, but not Working Memory, play an indirect role in avoiding interference from co-representation. These findings contribute to the Joint Action Development literature, by demonstrating at least one way in which adult and child joint action may not be comparable. They also shed light on the adult co-representation literature, by highlighting cognitive skills that may interact with co-representation in order to reduce potential interference.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Co-representation has been argued to be a mechanism in adult joint action that allows participants in a joint task to co-ordinate their actions with a partner. Substantial evidence for this mechanism has come from tasks such as the joint Simon task (Sebanz, Knoblich & Prinz, 2003), which show interference from a partner’s task on one’s own performance. The following studies aim to use this mechanism as a measure of children’s joint action abilities and a way of directly comparing adult and child behaviours. Chapter 1 presents three studies which suggest a developmental onset of co-representation effects at around 4 years old. Chapter 2 attempts to uncover what type of representations may be formed in joint tasks at this age. Chapter 3 presents an individual differences study, suggesting that both Inhibitory Control and explicit Theory of Mind, but not Working Memory, play an indirect role in avoiding interference from co-representation. These findings contribute to the Joint Action Development literature, by demonstrating at least one way in which adult and child joint action may not be comparable. They also shed light on the adult co-representation literature, by highlighting cognitive skills that may interact with co-representation in order to reduce potential interference.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Co-representation has been argued to be a mechanism in adult joint action that allows participants in a joint task to co-ordinate their actions with a partner. Substantial evidence for this mechanism has come from tasks such as the joint Simon task (Sebanz, Knoblich & Prinz, 2003), which show interference from a partner’s task on one’s own performance. The following studies aim to use this mechanism as a measure of children’s joint action abilities and a way of directly comparing adult and child behaviours. Chapter 1 presents three studies which suggest a developmental onset of co-representation effects at around 4 years old. Chapter 2 attempts to uncover what type of representations may be formed in joint tasks at this age. Chapter 3 presents an individual differences study, suggesting that both Inhibitory Control and explicit Theory of Mind, but not Working Memory, play an indirect role in avoiding interference from co-representation. These findings contribute to the Joint Action Development literature, by demonstrating at least one way in which adult and child joint action may not be comparable. They also shed light on the adult co-representation literature, by highlighting cognitive skills that may interact with co-representation in order to reduce potential interference.

Key concepts: Representation (politics), Psychology, Task (project management), Working memory, Cognition, Cognitive psychology, Mechanism (biology), Action (physics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
LEARNING TO ACT AS A TEAM: DEVELOPMENTAL ONSET, UNDERLYING PROCESSES AND PRE-REQUISITES OF CO-REPRESENTATION IN EARLY CHILDHOOD — Research Paper | ScholarLens