2010Transportation Research Board 89th Annual MeetingTransportation Research BoardRequires access

A quick cost-effective solution to rail overcrowding - the Melbourne free 'early bird' ticket experience

Graham Currie

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Rail overcrowding has become endemic for many major cities. Solutions are problematic since they require substantial funding and years to implement. This paper reviews the performance of a new approach implemented in Melbourne, Australia. Called the bird the promotion offers passengers free rail travel if trips are completed before 7 am. The program costs $Aust 6M per annum in lost fare revenues and around 8-9,000 passengers use the ticket each weekday. Some 23 per cent of these have shifted the time of travel (around 2,000 to 2,600 passengers) by an average of 42 minutes. This has reduced demand in the peak by between 1.2 per cent and 1.5 per cent from previous levels and is the equivalent of a maximum of 5 average train loads (or 3 per cent of total peak trains). Demand growth during this period has far outweighed this effect so overloading rose after early bird was introduced. Its effect was to reduce the scale of increased overloading. Overall it is unclear to what degree it has acted to reduce overloading. Peak travel in the less critical 7-8 peak hour has been reduced however its impact in the critical 8-9 peak hour is low. However the program pays for itself by providing relief equivalent to 2.5 to 5 peak trains. Economic benefits are likely to be higher. When considering alternatives there is no equivalent measure which could be implemented at such a cost so quickly.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Rail overcrowding has become endemic for many major cities. Solutions are problematic since they require substantial funding and years to implement. This paper reviews the performance of a new approach implemented in Melbourne, Australia. Called the bird the promotion offers passengers free rail travel if trips are completed before 7 am. The program costs $Aust 6M per annum in lost fare revenues and around 8-9,000 passengers use the ticket each weekday. Some 23 per cent of these have shifted the time of travel (around 2,000 to 2,600 passengers) by an average of 42 minutes. This has reduced demand in the peak by between 1.2 per cent and 1.5 per cent from previous levels and is the equivalent of a maximum of 5 average train loads (or 3 per cent of total peak trains). Demand growth during this period has far outweighed this effect so overloading rose after early bird was introduced. Its effect was to reduce the scale of increased overloading. Overall it is unclear to what degree it has acted to reduce overloading. Peak travel in the less critical 7-8 peak hour has been reduced however its impact in the critical 8-9 peak hour is low. However the program pays for itself by providing relief equivalent to 2.5 to 5 peak trains. Economic benefits are likely to be higher. When considering alternatives there is no equivalent measure which could be implemented at such a cost so quickly.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Rail overcrowding has become endemic for many major cities. Solutions are problematic since they require substantial funding and years to implement. This paper reviews the performance of a new approach implemented in Melbourne, Australia. Called the bird the promotion offers passengers free rail travel if trips are completed before 7 am. The program costs $Aust 6M per annum in lost fare revenues and around 8-9,000 passengers use the ticket each weekday. Some 23 per cent of these have shifted the time of travel (around 2,000 to 2,600 passengers) by an average of 42 minutes. This has reduced demand in the peak by between 1.2 per cent and 1.5 per cent from previous levels and is the equivalent of a maximum of 5 average train loads (or 3 per cent of total peak trains). Demand growth during this period has far outweighed this effect so overloading rose after early bird was introduced. Its effect was to reduce the scale of increased overloading. Overall it is unclear to what degree it has acted to reduce overloading. Peak travel in the less critical 7-8 peak hour has been reduced however its impact in the critical 8-9 peak hour is low. However the program pays for itself by providing relief equivalent to 2.5 to 5 peak trains. Economic benefits are likely to be higher. When considering alternatives there is no equivalent measure which could be implemented at such a cost so quickly.

Key concepts: Overcrowding, Train, Ticket, Revenue, TRIPS architecture, Agricultural economics, Transport engineering, Rush hour

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A quick cost-effective solution to rail overcrowding - the Melbourne free 'early bird' ticket experience — Research Paper | ScholarLens