2011Cambridge University Press eBooksRequires access

Commentary to the Draft Bill on Civil Liability Law

Gert Brüggemeier

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Four basic assumptions The Draft Bill takes as its fundament the present state of the intense legal discussion of liability law in Europe, at EU as well as at Member State level. This discussion embodies a huge amount of academic literature. The law of delict in the great codifications of the nineteenth century, the French civil code of 1804 and the German civil code of 1896/1900, merely serve as a first orientation and starting point. The civil law codifications of the nineteenth century, both inside and outside of Europe, were largely modelled on the French Code civil, but from the turn of the twentieth century onwards, the BGB assumed this model role, especially in Japan, Russia, Brazil and China. However, the law of delict in the Japanese (1898) and Chinese (1930) civil codes had also already modified the rigidness of the German law. Now, more than ever, a liability law for the twenty-first century must find its own path.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

INTRODUCTION Four basic assumptions The Draft Bill takes as its fundament the present state of the intense legal discussion of liability law in Europe, at EU as well as at Member State level. This discussion embodies a huge amount of academic literature. The law of delict in the great codifications of the nineteenth century, the French civil code of 1804 and the German civil code of 1896/1900, merely serve as a first orientation and starting point. The civil law codifications of the nineteenth century, both inside and outside of Europe, were largely modelled on the French Code civil, but from the turn of the twentieth century onwards, the BGB assumed this model role, especially in Japan, Russia, Brazil and China. However, the law of delict in the Japanese (1898) and Chinese (1930) civil codes had also already modified the rigidness of the German law. Now, more than ever, a liability law for the twenty-first century must find its own path.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

INTRODUCTION Four basic assumptions The Draft Bill takes as its fundament the present state of the intense legal discussion of liability law in Europe, at EU as well as at Member State level. This discussion embodies a huge amount of academic literature. The law of delict in the great codifications of the nineteenth century, the French civil code of 1804 and the German civil code of 1896/1900, merely serve as a first orientation and starting point. The civil law codifications of the nineteenth century, both inside and outside of Europe, were largely modelled on the French Code civil, but from the turn of the twentieth century onwards, the BGB assumed this model role, especially in Japan, Russia, Brazil and China. However, the law of delict in the Japanese (1898) and Chinese (1930) civil codes had also already modified the rigidness of the German law. Now, more than ever, a liability law for the twenty-first century must find its own path.

Key concepts: Delict, Civil code, Law, Civil law (Civil law), Political science, German, Legal liability, Comparative law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Commentary to the Draft Bill on Civil Liability Law — Research Paper | ScholarLens