1971PubMedOpen access

Bluetongue virus: some relationships among North American isolates and further comparisons with EHD virus.

F C Thomas, D. O. Trainer

Open full text 12 citations

Abstract

Seven isolates of bluetongue virus with different isolation histories and one isolate of the virus of epizootic hemorrhagic disease of deer were cloned by three consecutive plaquings in L-929 cells. The isolates were categorized on plaque size and margin. Antisera to the bluetongue virus isolates were produced in calves and antiserum to epizootic hemorrhagic disease virus in deer. Plaque reduction neutralization tests were done using the eight isolates and antisera to six of these. The isolates could be partially categorized on plaque type. In the plaque reduction neutralization test, all of the bluetongue viruses cross reacted and although differences were frequently observed, no obvious antigenic classification was possible. Reactions between the bluetongue viruses and epizootic hemorrhagic disease virus were all within the limits of what is presently considered to be non-specific inhibition.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Seven isolates of bluetongue virus with different isolation histories and one isolate of the virus of epizootic hemorrhagic disease of deer were cloned by three consecutive plaquings in L-929 cells. The isolates were categorized on plaque size and margin. Antisera to the bluetongue virus isolates were produced in calves and antiserum to epizootic hemorrhagic disease virus in deer. Plaque reduction neutralization tests were done using the eight isolates and antisera to six of these. The isolates could be partially categorized on plaque type. In the plaque reduction neutralization test, all of the bluetongue viruses cross reacted and although differences were frequently observed, no obvious antigenic classification was possible. Reactions between the bluetongue viruses and epizootic hemorrhagic disease virus were all within the limits of what is presently considered to be non-specific inhibition.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Seven isolates of bluetongue virus with different isolation histories and one isolate of the virus of epizootic hemorrhagic disease of deer were cloned by three consecutive plaquings in L-929 cells. The isolates were categorized on plaque size and margin. Antisera to the bluetongue virus isolates were produced in calves and antiserum to epizootic hemorrhagic disease virus in deer. Plaque reduction neutralization tests were done using the eight isolates and antisera to six of these. The isolates could be partially categorized on plaque type. In the plaque reduction neutralization test, all of the bluetongue viruses cross reacted and although differences were frequently observed, no obvious antigenic classification was possible. Reactions between the bluetongue viruses and epizootic hemorrhagic disease virus were all within the limits of what is presently considered to be non-specific inhibition.

Key concepts: Virology, Epizootic, Virus, Orbivirus, Biology, Plaque reduction neutralization test, Antiserum, Neutralization

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Bluetongue virus: some relationships among North American isolates and further comparisons with EHD virus. — Research Paper | ScholarLens