Fault and event trees
Tim Bedford, Roger Cooke
Abstract
Tim Bedford, Roger Cooke
Abstract
Fault and event trees Fault and event trees are modeling tools used as part of a quantitative analysis of a system. Other semi-quantitative or qualitative tools such as failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) are often performed in preparation for a more exact analysis. Such tools are outside the (quantitative) scope of this book, and the interested reader is referred to [Kumamoto and Henley, 1996], [Andrews and Moss, 1993]. These books also provide further information and more examples on fault tree modeling as does the Fault Tree Handbook [Vesely et al. , 1981]. Fault tree and event tree analyses are two of the basic tools in system analysis. Both methodologies give rise to a pictorial representation of a statement in Boolean logic. We shall concentrate on fault tree analysis, but briefly explain the difference in the situations modeled by event trees and fault trees. Event trees use ‘forward logic’. They begin with an initiating event (an abnormal incident) and ‘propagate’ this event through the system under study by considering all possible ways in which it can effect the behaviour of the (sub)system. The nodes of an event tree represent the possible functioning or malfunctioning of a (sub)system. If a sufficient set of such systems functions normally then the plant will return to normal operating conditions. A path through an event tree resulting in an accident is called an accident sequence .
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Fault and event trees Fault and event trees are modeling tools used as part of a quantitative analysis of a system. Other semi-quantitative or qualitative tools such as failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) are often performed in preparation for a more exact analysis. Such tools are outside the (quantitative) scope of this book, and the interested reader is referred to [Kumamoto and Henley, 1996], [Andrews and Moss, 1993]. These books also provide further information and more examples on fault tree modeling as does the Fault Tree Handbook [Vesely et al. , 1981]. Fault tree and event tree analyses are two of the basic tools in system analysis. Both methodologies give rise to a pictorial representation of a statement in Boolean logic. We shall concentrate on fault tree analysis, but briefly explain the difference in the situations modeled by event trees and fault trees. Event trees use ‘forward logic’. They begin with an initiating event (an abnormal incident) and ‘propagate’ this event through the system under study by considering all possible ways in which it can effect the behaviour of the (sub)system. The nodes of an event tree represent the possible functioning or malfunctioning of a (sub)system. If a sufficient set of such systems functions normally then the plant will return to normal operating conditions. A path through an event tree resulting in an accident is called an accident sequence .
Key concepts: Fault tree analysis, Event (particle physics), Scope (computer science), Computer science, Fault (geology), Event tree analysis, Tree (set theory), Event tree