2014Unpublished venueRequires access

Safer speeds: public acceptance and compliance

Shane Turner, David Logan, J Khoo, Shaun Bosher, H Trumper

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

A key element of the Safer Journeys national road safety strategy is safer speeds. In some cases, particularly where investment to make roads safer at current speeds cannot be justified, this means reduced speed limits for both urban and rural roads. This research considered the level of acceptance of and compliance with reduced speed limits. It examined information from a number of speed limit changes around New Zealand, including town centres, along strip shopping, suburban streets, mountainous roads, flat state highways and local roads. Before and after speeds were compared for any speed reductions and driver compliance. The acceptance of reduced speed limits was researched using the limited literature available on this topic, a web questionnaire survey and the experience of three local councils. These showed a greater acceptance of reduced speed limits on hilly and mountainous rural roads and in shopping streets. There was less acceptance for reduced speed limits in suburban streets (except immediately around schools) and on straight flat rural roads with a lot of roadside hazards and frequently occurring priority intersections. Drivers do not appear to understand the crash risks of these scenarios, even when relatively extensive media and consultation programmes are undertaken.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A key element of the Safer Journeys national road safety strategy is safer speeds. In some cases, particularly where investment to make roads safer at current speeds cannot be justified, this means reduced speed limits for both urban and rural roads. This research considered the level of acceptance of and compliance with reduced speed limits. It examined information from a number of speed limit changes around New Zealand, including town centres, along strip shopping, suburban streets, mountainous roads, flat state highways and local roads. Before and after speeds were compared for any speed reductions and driver compliance. The acceptance of reduced speed limits was researched using the limited literature available on this topic, a web questionnaire survey and the experience of three local councils. These showed a greater acceptance of reduced speed limits on hilly and mountainous rural roads and in shopping streets. There was less acceptance for reduced speed limits in suburban streets (except immediately around schools) and on straight flat rural roads with a lot of roadside hazards and frequently occurring priority intersections. Drivers do not appear to understand the crash risks of these scenarios, even when relatively extensive media and consultation programmes are undertaken.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A key element of the Safer Journeys national road safety strategy is safer speeds. In some cases, particularly where investment to make roads safer at current speeds cannot be justified, this means reduced speed limits for both urban and rural roads. This research considered the level of acceptance of and compliance with reduced speed limits. It examined information from a number of speed limit changes around New Zealand, including town centres, along strip shopping, suburban streets, mountainous roads, flat state highways and local roads. Before and after speeds were compared for any speed reductions and driver compliance. The acceptance of reduced speed limits was researched using the limited literature available on this topic, a web questionnaire survey and the experience of three local councils. These showed a greater acceptance of reduced speed limits on hilly and mountainous rural roads and in shopping streets. There was less acceptance for reduced speed limits in suburban streets (except immediately around schools) and on straight flat rural roads with a lot of roadside hazards and frequently occurring priority intersections. Drivers do not appear to understand the crash risks of these scenarios, even when relatively extensive media and consultation programmes are undertaken.

Key concepts: SAFER, Speed limit, Transport engineering, Crash, Rural area, Business, Engineering, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Safer speeds: public acceptance and compliance — Research Paper | ScholarLens