Returning “Decision” to School Discipline Decisions: An Analysis of Recent, Anti-Zero Tolerance Legislation
Rebecca B. Morton
Abstract
Open-access reader
Rebecca B. Morton
Abstract
Open-access reader
Public school districts across America are evaluating the effectiveness of zero tolerance school discipline policies.1 Initially developed in the 1980s to combat the war on drugs, zero tolerance policies spread to school districts in the wake of congressional legislation addressing concerns for school safety.2 In addition to expulsions mandated by the Gun-Free Schools Act of 1994, 3 many states required expulsion for other offenses on school property including drug possession, violence, disruptions, and other anti-social behavior.4 Although federal and state drug enforcement agencies eventually abandoned zero tolerance because of its rigidity, 5 zero tolerance attitudes remain ingrained in school districts nationwide.6 Such policies eliminate consideration of student-specific factors.Thus, violations of these policies are effectively strict liability offenses for which a student is disciplined 1. See The Editorial Board, Zero Tolerance, Reconsidered, N.Y.TIMES, Jan. 6, 2014, at A18,
OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Public school districts across America are evaluating the effectiveness of zero tolerance school discipline policies.1 Initially developed in the 1980s to combat the war on drugs, zero tolerance policies spread to school districts in the wake of congressional legislation addressing concerns for school safety.2 In addition to expulsions mandated by the Gun-Free Schools Act of 1994, 3 many states required expulsion for other offenses on school property including drug possession, violence, disruptions, and other anti-social behavior.4 Although federal and state drug enforcement agencies eventually abandoned zero tolerance because of its rigidity, 5 zero tolerance attitudes remain ingrained in school districts nationwide.6 Such policies eliminate consideration of student-specific factors.Thus, violations of these policies are effectively strict liability offenses for which a student is disciplined 1. See The Editorial Board, Zero Tolerance, Reconsidered, N.Y.TIMES, Jan. 6, 2014, at A18,
Key concepts: Legislation, Zero tolerance, Zero (linguistics), Political science, Actuarial science, Law, Law and economics, Economics