Defining types of economic evaluation.
Surachat Ngorsuraches
Abstract
Surachat Ngorsuraches
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Recommend types of economic evaluation for Thai health technology assessment (HTA) guideline. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Various types of economic evaluation, including their definitions and background theories from research documentations were explored. In addition, the international economic evaluation guidelines were reviewed. Finally, the recommendations for Thai HTA guideline were made. RESULT: There are generally four types of economic evaluation: Cost-BenefitAnalysis (CBA), Cost-Minimization Analysis (CMA), Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (CEA), and Cost-Utility Analysis (CUA). Theories ofwelfare and extra-welfare economics were used to explain each type of economic evaluation. From the international guidelines, each country's guideline has its own preferred types of economic evaluation. CEA and CUA were more likely to be recommended in those guidelines. CONCLUSION: For Thai HTA guideline, CUA was recommended to be a method of choice. However CEA could be used, especially when only intermediate outcomes of compared alternatives are available.
OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
OBJECTIVE: Recommend types of economic evaluation for Thai health technology assessment (HTA) guideline. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Various types of economic evaluation, including their definitions and background theories from research documentations were explored. In addition, the international economic evaluation guidelines were reviewed. Finally, the recommendations for Thai HTA guideline were made. RESULT: There are generally four types of economic evaluation: Cost-BenefitAnalysis (CBA), Cost-Minimization Analysis (CMA), Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (CEA), and Cost-Utility Analysis (CUA). Theories ofwelfare and extra-welfare economics were used to explain each type of economic evaluation. From the international guidelines, each country's guideline has its own preferred types of economic evaluation. CEA and CUA were more likely to be recommended in those guidelines. CONCLUSION: For Thai HTA guideline, CUA was recommended to be a method of choice. However CEA could be used, especially when only intermediate outcomes of compared alternatives are available.
Key concepts: Guideline, Economic evaluation, Medicine, Cost–utility analysis, Cost–benefit analysis, Economic analysis, Cost-effectiveness analysis, Economic welfare