2005PubMedOpen access

Effects of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor on cardiac remodeling after myocardial infarction.

Yasuhiro Takagi, Minoru Yoshiyama, Takashi Omura, Ryo Matsumoto, Takanori Kusuyama, Soichiro Enomoto, Yasuhiro Nakamura, Kaname Akioka, Kazuhide Takeuchi, Junichi Yoshikawa

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggest that granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) may be beneficial in the treatment of myocardial infarction (MI). However, the effects of G-CSF on MI are still controversial and the molecular mechanism of G-CSF treatment for repair of the infarcted heart is not fully understood. METHODS: Mice were divided into three groups: Control, MI and MI treated with G-CSF. Four weeks after MI, we examined cardiac function by Doppler echocardiography and measured non-infarcted myocardial mRNA expression by northern blot analysis. RESULTS: Cardiac function decreased significantly in the MI groups compared with the sham-operated groups. Additionally, the ratios of E wave to A wave peak velocity (E/A) in the MI groups were higher than in the control group. E/A in G-CSF MI mice was significantly lower than in control MI mice (p<0.01). Matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) mRNA expression was significantly increased in the MI groups compared with the control group (p<0.01). Furthermore, mRNA expression in the G-CSF MI group was significantly higher than in the Control MI group (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: G-CSF can prevent the LV remodeling process after MI that accompanies progressive cardiac dysfunction. One of the mechanisms of G-CSF treatment for cardiac remodeling after MI may be overexpression of MMP-2 in non-infarcted myocardium.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggest that granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) may be beneficial in the treatment of myocardial infarction (MI). However, the effects of G-CSF on MI are still controversial and the molecular mechanism of G-CSF treatment for repair of the infarcted heart is not fully understood. METHODS: Mice were divided into three groups: Control, MI and MI treated with G-CSF. Four weeks after MI, we examined cardiac function by Doppler echocardiography and measured non-infarcted myocardial mRNA expression by northern blot analysis. RESULTS: Cardiac function decreased significantly in the MI groups compared with the sham-operated groups. Additionally, the ratios of E wave to A wave peak velocity (E/A) in the MI groups were higher than in the control group. E/A in G-CSF MI mice was significantly lower than in control MI mice (p<0.01). Matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) mRNA expression was significantly increased in the MI groups compared with the control group (p<0.01). Furthermore, mRNA expression in the G-CSF MI group was significantly higher than in the Control MI group (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: G-CSF can prevent the LV remodeling process after MI that accompanies progressive cardiac dysfunction. One of the mechanisms of G-CSF treatment for cardiac remodeling after MI may be overexpression of MMP-2 in non-infarcted myocardium.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggest that granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) may be beneficial in the treatment of myocardial infarction (MI). However, the effects of G-CSF on MI are still controversial and the molecular mechanism of G-CSF treatment for repair of the infarcted heart is not fully understood. METHODS: Mice were divided into three groups: Control, MI and MI treated with G-CSF. Four weeks after MI, we examined cardiac function by Doppler echocardiography and measured non-infarcted myocardial mRNA expression by northern blot analysis. RESULTS: Cardiac function decreased significantly in the MI groups compared with the sham-operated groups. Additionally, the ratios of E wave to A wave peak velocity (E/A) in the MI groups were higher than in the control group. E/A in G-CSF MI mice was significantly lower than in control MI mice (p<0.01). Matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) mRNA expression was significantly increased in the MI groups compared with the control group (p<0.01). Furthermore, mRNA expression in the G-CSF MI group was significantly higher than in the Control MI group (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: G-CSF can prevent the LV remodeling process after MI that accompanies progressive cardiac dysfunction. One of the mechanisms of G-CSF treatment for cardiac remodeling after MI may be overexpression of MMP-2 in non-infarcted myocardium.

Key concepts: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, Medicine, Myocardial infarction, Cardiac function curve, Internal medicine, Ventricular remodeling, Cardiology, Heart failure

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effects of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor on cardiac remodeling after myocardial infarction. — Research Paper | ScholarLens