2014Unpublished venueRequires access

An analysis of the British National Party’s Discourse:

Callum Cook

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In the context of the rise of the far right and populist extremism across Europe, this study focuses on the British National Party. The study period ranges from 2001 to 2010, following Nick Griffin’s ascension to Chairman of the party and his subsequent engagement in parliamentary politics. In analysing the party’s election manifestos from the years of 2001, 2005, and 2010 using the technique of ‘reading against the grain’, a historical development over time is identifiable. This gives insight into the strategies used and tactics employed by the British National Party in attempting to achieve electoral success. How the language, approach, and argumentation adapts and evolves over time forms the basis of this study, which offers an explanation for these developments through considering the changing context. This study details how the British National Party seeks to offer a ‘radical but commonsense program for change’ in different years, while its core policies and ideology remain largely unchanged.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In the context of the rise of the far right and populist extremism across Europe, this study focuses on the British National Party. The study period ranges from 2001 to 2010, following Nick Griffin’s ascension to Chairman of the party and his subsequent engagement in parliamentary politics. In analysing the party’s election manifestos from the years of 2001, 2005, and 2010 using the technique of ‘reading against the grain’, a historical development over time is identifiable. This gives insight into the strategies used and tactics employed by the British National Party in attempting to achieve electoral success. How the language, approach, and argumentation adapts and evolves over time forms the basis of this study, which offers an explanation for these developments through considering the changing context. This study details how the British National Party seeks to offer a ‘radical but commonsense program for change’ in different years, while its core policies and ideology remain largely unchanged.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In the context of the rise of the far right and populist extremism across Europe, this study focuses on the British National Party. The study period ranges from 2001 to 2010, following Nick Griffin’s ascension to Chairman of the party and his subsequent engagement in parliamentary politics. In analysing the party’s election manifestos from the years of 2001, 2005, and 2010 using the technique of ‘reading against the grain’, a historical development over time is identifiable. This gives insight into the strategies used and tactics employed by the British National Party in attempting to achieve electoral success. How the language, approach, and argumentation adapts and evolves over time forms the basis of this study, which offers an explanation for these developments through considering the changing context. This study details how the British National Party seeks to offer a ‘radical but commonsense program for change’ in different years, while its core policies and ideology remain largely unchanged.

Key concepts: Griffin, Ideology, Context (archaeology), Politics, Period (music), Political science, Reading (process), General election

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
An analysis of the British National Party’s Discourse: — Research Paper | ScholarLens