Sunflower Meal as a Protein Supplement for Growing Ruminants
C. R. Richardson, R.N.Beville, Robert Kingsley Ratcliff, Robert C. Albin
Abstract
C. R. Richardson, R.N.Beville, Robert Kingsley Ratcliff, Robert C. Albin
Abstract
Nutritional value of sunflower meal (SFM) as a protein supplement for growing cattle and sheep was determined by the evaluation of treatment effects on in vivo digestibility, N retention, average daily gain, feed efficiency and wool growth. Three experiments—two steer digestion and metabolism studies and one lamb feedlot study—were conducted. No differences (P>.05) were found in total diet digestibility of N retention of steers fed Coastal bermudagrass hay and urea diets in which 0, 5, 10 or 20% SFM was added to replace hay on an air-dry basis. In Exp. 2, SFM was substituted for cottonseed meal (CSM) in a growing-finishing feedlot diet at levels of 0, 5.5, 11 and 22%. No differences (P>.05) in digestibility were detected at the 0, 5.5 and 11% levels, indicating that solvent-extracted SFM, when fed on an equal crude protein and crude fiber basis, was similar to solvent-processed CSM. Dry matter and organic matter digestibilities of the complete diets were highest (P<.05) in steers fed the 22% SFM diet. No differences (P>.05) in N retention were observed. In the third experiment, 120 feedlot lambs were fed SFM, CSM or a combination of SFM and CSM in 8 and 12% crude protein growing-finishing diets. Lambs fed the 12% crude protein diets had similar (P>.05) gains. However, gains with the 12% CSM diet were not different (P>.05) from those with the 8% SFM diet but were greater (P<.05) than those with the 8% CSM diet. No differences (P>.05) in feed efficiency were observed at similar crude protein levels; however, efficiency with the 12% diets was superior (P<.05) to that with both 8% diets.
OpenAlex reports 28 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Nutritional value of sunflower meal (SFM) as a protein supplement for growing cattle and sheep was determined by the evaluation of treatment effects on in vivo digestibility, N retention, average daily gain, feed efficiency and wool growth. Three experiments—two steer digestion and metabolism studies and one lamb feedlot study—were conducted. No differences (P>.05) were found in total diet digestibility of N retention of steers fed Coastal bermudagrass hay and urea diets in which 0, 5, 10 or 20% SFM was added to replace hay on an air-dry basis. In Exp. 2, SFM was substituted for cottonseed meal (CSM) in a growing-finishing feedlot diet at levels of 0, 5.5, 11 and 22%. No differences (P>.05) in digestibility were detected at the 0, 5.5 and 11% levels, indicating that solvent-extracted SFM, when fed on an equal crude protein and crude fiber basis, was similar to solvent-processed CSM. Dry matter and organic matter digestibilities of the complete diets were highest (P<.05) in steers fed the 22% SFM diet. No differences (P>.05) in N retention were observed. In the third experiment, 120 feedlot lambs were fed SFM, CSM or a combination of SFM and CSM in 8 and 12% crude protein growing-finishing diets. Lambs fed the 12% crude protein diets had similar (P>.05) gains. However, gains with the 12% CSM diet were not different (P>.05) from those with the 8% SFM diet but were greater (P<.05) than those with the 8% CSM diet. No differences (P>.05) in feed efficiency were observed at similar crude protein levels; however, efficiency with the 12% diets was superior (P<.05) to that with both 8% diets.
Key concepts: Meal, Sunflower, Animal science, Biology, Fish meal, Food science, Agronomy, Fishery