1995Highways and transportationRequires access

Traffic calming : have we given everyone the hump, or is it just a load of chicanery ?

M Bulpitt

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

This paper outlines the history of traffic calming, and discusses some of the traffic calming projects introduced in the county of Kent in England. Kent County Council (CC) developed its first traffic calming sites in 1987, but was always critical of the original 4m long 100mm high blacktop 'rollover' hump. It soon developed the lower, more user-friendly 'flat-topped' or 'Kent-style' road hump. As the number of clamped areas expanded, Kent CC developed other types of scheme, including: (1) one-way ramped narrows, with traffic having to give way at alternating pinch-points; (2) half and full chicane on primary and secondary roads in rural villages and on some urban streets; and (3) an urban safety management project covering a zone with 3500 houses. Although these schemes reduced speeds by up to 10mph, accidents by up to 80%, and through traffic by 30-50%, many residents considered that the schemes adversely affected their local environment; criticisms also came from bus and emergency services. As a result, Kent CC conducted trials of specialist vehicles over various forms of traffic calming. Humps and ramps were then flattened, and further alternatives sought. Calming schemes using only horizontal deflections are now being applied to main roads passing through small towns and villages.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper outlines the history of traffic calming, and discusses some of the traffic calming projects introduced in the county of Kent in England. Kent County Council (CC) developed its first traffic calming sites in 1987, but was always critical of the original 4m long 100mm high blacktop 'rollover' hump. It soon developed the lower, more user-friendly 'flat-topped' or 'Kent-style' road hump. As the number of clamped areas expanded, Kent CC developed other types of scheme, including: (1) one-way ramped narrows, with traffic having to give way at alternating pinch-points; (2) half and full chicane on primary and secondary roads in rural villages and on some urban streets; and (3) an urban safety management project covering a zone with 3500 houses. Although these schemes reduced speeds by up to 10mph, accidents by up to 80%, and through traffic by 30-50%, many residents considered that the schemes adversely affected their local environment; criticisms also came from bus and emergency services. As a result, Kent CC conducted trials of specialist vehicles over various forms of traffic calming. Humps and ramps were then flattened, and further alternatives sought. Calming schemes using only horizontal deflections are now being applied to main roads passing through small towns and villages.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper outlines the history of traffic calming, and discusses some of the traffic calming projects introduced in the county of Kent in England. Kent County Council (CC) developed its first traffic calming sites in 1987, but was always critical of the original 4m long 100mm high blacktop 'rollover' hump. It soon developed the lower, more user-friendly 'flat-topped' or 'Kent-style' road hump. As the number of clamped areas expanded, Kent CC developed other types of scheme, including: (1) one-way ramped narrows, with traffic having to give way at alternating pinch-points; (2) half and full chicane on primary and secondary roads in rural villages and on some urban streets; and (3) an urban safety management project covering a zone with 3500 houses. Although these schemes reduced speeds by up to 10mph, accidents by up to 80%, and through traffic by 30-50%, many residents considered that the schemes adversely affected their local environment; criticisms also came from bus and emergency services. As a result, Kent CC conducted trials of specialist vehicles over various forms of traffic calming. Humps and ramps were then flattened, and further alternatives sought. Calming schemes using only horizontal deflections are now being applied to main roads passing through small towns and villages.

Key concepts: Traffic calming, Transport engineering, Engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Traffic calming : have we given everyone the hump, or is it just a load of chicanery ? — Research Paper | ScholarLens