2000Unpublished venueRequires access

The Nature of Future Intelligence Organizations

Leo R. Pacher

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This monograph identifies the essential characteristics and capabilities of intelligence organization structures for an army force that is global, rapidly deployable and capable of executing full spectrum military operations in joint and combined environments. It identifies these characteristics and capabilities by tracing the evolution of military intelligence organization structures over the past decade. It examines lessons learned from deployments to Somalia, Bosnia and Haiti as well as observations from Division Advanced Warfighting Experiments (DAWE) to determine causes of recurring problems related to intelligence organizational design. This monograph proposes a traditional, matrix and virtual models as potential intelligence organization structures. It analyzes each model’s strengths and weaknesses, identifies essential characteristics, and assesses applicability of each relative to future environmental influences specific to offense, defense, stability and support operations. These environmental influences are stability, complexity and diversity. They are important considerations because they often necessitate changes in organizational design. Intelligence staffs are resources as much as military units with specific capabilities. As such, commanders should task organize, design and reconfigure their intelligence staffs within the context of environmental influences. This requirement is more important in the 21st Century as the Army continues to wrestle with its role within the changing face of battle. Army leaders must understand the importance of organizational dynamics and design because “cookie cutter” solutions for future intelligence staff organizations are obsolete. This monograph asserts that organizational restructuring can alleviate some recurring problems. It recommends that the matrix organization is best suited to cope with future environmental influences because it appropriately balances requirements for organizational flexibility, adaptability, and responsiveness relative to the range of environmental stability, complexity and diversity. Each model is intended to provide a framework for building intelligence teams for future military operations.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This monograph identifies the essential characteristics and capabilities of intelligence organization structures for an army force that is global, rapidly deployable and capable of executing full spectrum military operations in joint and combined environments. It identifies these characteristics and capabilities by tracing the evolution of military intelligence organization structures over the past decade. It examines lessons learned from deployments to Somalia, Bosnia and Haiti as well as observations from Division Advanced Warfighting Experiments (DAWE) to determine causes of recurring problems related to intelligence organizational design. This monograph proposes a traditional, matrix and virtual models as potential intelligence organization structures. It analyzes each model’s strengths and weaknesses, identifies essential characteristics, and assesses applicability of each relative to future environmental influences specific to offense, defense, stability and support operations. These environmental influences are stability, complexity and diversity. They are important considerations because they often necessitate changes in organizational design. Intelligence staffs are resources as much as military units with specific capabilities. As such, commanders should task organize, design and reconfigure their intelligence staffs within the context of environmental influences. This requirement is more important in the 21st Century as the Army continues to wrestle with its role within the changing face of battle. Army leaders must understand the importance of organizational dynamics and design because “cookie cutter” solutions for future intelligence staff organizations are obsolete. This monograph asserts that organizational restructuring can alleviate some recurring problems. It recommends that the matrix organization is best suited to cope with future environmental influences because it appropriately balances requirements for organizational flexibility, adaptability, and responsiveness relative to the range of environmental stability, complexity and diversity. Each model is intended to provide a framework for building intelligence teams for future military operations.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This monograph identifies the essential characteristics and capabilities of intelligence organization structures for an army force that is global, rapidly deployable and capable of executing full spectrum military operations in joint and combined environments. It identifies these characteristics and capabilities by tracing the evolution of military intelligence organization structures over the past decade. It examines lessons learned from deployments to Somalia, Bosnia and Haiti as well as observations from Division Advanced Warfighting Experiments (DAWE) to determine causes of recurring problems related to intelligence organizational design. This monograph proposes a traditional, matrix and virtual models as potential intelligence organization structures. It analyzes each model’s strengths and weaknesses, identifies essential characteristics, and assesses applicability of each relative to future environmental influences specific to offense, defense, stability and support operations. These environmental influences are stability, complexity and diversity. They are important considerations because they often necessitate changes in organizational design. Intelligence staffs are resources as much as military units with specific capabilities. As such, commanders should task organize, design and reconfigure their intelligence staffs within the context of environmental influences. This requirement is more important in the 21st Century as the Army continues to wrestle with its role within the changing face of battle. Army leaders must understand the importance of organizational dynamics and design because “cookie cutter” solutions for future intelligence staff organizations are obsolete. This monograph asserts that organizational restructuring can alleviate some recurring problems. It recommends that the matrix organization is best suited to cope with future environmental influences because it appropriately balances requirements for organizational flexibility, adaptability, and responsiveness relative to the range of environmental stability, complexity and diversity. Each model is intended to provide a framework for building intelligence teams for future military operations.

Key concepts: Business, Knowledge management, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Nature of Future Intelligence Organizations — Research Paper | ScholarLens