2003Humana Press eBooksOpen access

Etoposide and Teniposide

Malcolm A. Smith

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Etoposide and teniposide are epipodophyllotoxins that inhibit topoisomerase II, a ubiquitous enzyme that is essential for survival and that plays critical roles in DNA metabolism, chromosome organization, and mitosis (1). Etoposide and teniposide act by stabilizing the covalent linkage between DNA and topoisomerase II (1). These agents have been studied in clinical trials for over 25 yr (2, 3), but their contribution to the therapy of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in children remains to be clearly elucidated. There are minor distinctions between etoposide and teniposide. The latter agent is more potent in in vitro tests of cytotoxicity, is associated with higher albumin binding, is more lipophilic, and has a slightly longer plasma elimination halflife (approx 8 vs 6 h) (4–6). However, these differences do not correlate with any therapeutic advantage for teniposide over etoposide in vivo (7). Randomized studies have shown that teniposide and etoposide have similar levels of antitumor activity when used at equitoxic doses (8, 9), and current regimens for leukemia that utilize an epipodophyllotoxin employ etoposide. Hence, in this chapter, the two agents are discussed under the assumption that they are more or less interchangeable.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Etoposide and teniposide are epipodophyllotoxins that inhibit topoisomerase II, a ubiquitous enzyme that is essential for survival and that plays critical roles in DNA metabolism, chromosome organization, and mitosis (1). Etoposide and teniposide act by stabilizing the covalent linkage between DNA and topoisomerase II (1). These agents have been studied in clinical trials for over 25 yr (2, 3), but their contribution to the therapy of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in children remains to be clearly elucidated. There are minor distinctions between etoposide and teniposide. The latter agent is more potent in in vitro tests of cytotoxicity, is associated with higher albumin binding, is more lipophilic, and has a slightly longer plasma elimination halflife (approx 8 vs 6 h) (4–6). However, these differences do not correlate with any therapeutic advantage for teniposide over etoposide in vivo (7). Randomized studies have shown that teniposide and etoposide have similar levels of antitumor activity when used at equitoxic doses (8, 9), and current regimens for leukemia that utilize an epipodophyllotoxin employ etoposide. Hence, in this chapter, the two agents are discussed under the assumption that they are more or less interchangeable.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Etoposide and teniposide are epipodophyllotoxins that inhibit topoisomerase II, a ubiquitous enzyme that is essential for survival and that plays critical roles in DNA metabolism, chromosome organization, and mitosis (1). Etoposide and teniposide act by stabilizing the covalent linkage between DNA and topoisomerase II (1). These agents have been studied in clinical trials for over 25 yr (2, 3), but their contribution to the therapy of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in children remains to be clearly elucidated. There are minor distinctions between etoposide and teniposide. The latter agent is more potent in in vitro tests of cytotoxicity, is associated with higher albumin binding, is more lipophilic, and has a slightly longer plasma elimination halflife (approx 8 vs 6 h) (4–6). However, these differences do not correlate with any therapeutic advantage for teniposide over etoposide in vivo (7). Randomized studies have shown that teniposide and etoposide have similar levels of antitumor activity when used at equitoxic doses (8, 9), and current regimens for leukemia that utilize an epipodophyllotoxin employ etoposide. Hence, in this chapter, the two agents are discussed under the assumption that they are more or less interchangeable.

Key concepts: Teniposide, Etoposide, Topoisomerase, Podophyllotoxin, Pharmacology, Myeloid leukemia, Chemistry, Cancer research

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Etoposide and Teniposide — Research Paper | ScholarLens