2018Unpublished venueRequires access

The Timber Resources of the Ohio Hill Country

Paul S. DeBald, Roger E. McCay

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

This report presents 1967 forest resource statistics for the Hill Country-Ohio's portion of Appalachia. The Hill Country comprises 28 counties, which were divided into three geographic sampling units for this survey. The Hill Country of the 1952 Ohio forest survey contained 26 of these counties. The additional Appalachia counties are Brown and Clermont in the South-Central Geographic Unit. The Southeastern and East-Central Units are the same as they were in the first survey. To facilitate making comparisons between inventories, we have adjusted 1952 Hill Country data to include Brown and Clermont Counties. The resurvey of Ohio forests is part of the nationwide program to maintain a current inventory of our timber resources, as authorized by the McSweeney-McNary Forest Research Act of 1928. Because forestry is so important in the Hill Country, the resurvey there was intensified to obtain more precise county information. The appropriation of $75,000 by the Ohio State Legislature made the intensification possible. The Division of Forestry and Reclamation of the Ohio Department of Natural Resources and the U.S.D.A. Forest Service planned the resurvey. Carl E. Mayer, project leader, directed the resurvey. Joseph E. Barnard was in charge of computing and tabulating all inventory data, including those for the Wayne National Forest, which were collected by personnel of the Eastern Region of the U.S.D.A. Forest Service. Members of the Northeastern Forest Experiment Station's survey unit collected the basic inventory data for all lands outside the Wayne National Forest. With the assistance of Division of Forestry and Reclamation personnel, they collected timber cut and timber products output data. The field work was completed in December 1967. We acknowledge, with special thanks the cooperation of the Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service, who provided up-to-date aerial photographs for use in the resurvey.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This report presents 1967 forest resource statistics for the Hill Country-Ohio's portion of Appalachia. The Hill Country comprises 28 counties, which were divided into three geographic sampling units for this survey. The Hill Country of the 1952 Ohio forest survey contained 26 of these counties. The additional Appalachia counties are Brown and Clermont in the South-Central Geographic Unit. The Southeastern and East-Central Units are the same as they were in the first survey. To facilitate making comparisons between inventories, we have adjusted 1952 Hill Country data to include Brown and Clermont Counties. The resurvey of Ohio forests is part of the nationwide program to maintain a current inventory of our timber resources, as authorized by the McSweeney-McNary Forest Research Act of 1928. Because forestry is so important in the Hill Country, the resurvey there was intensified to obtain more precise county information. The appropriation of $75,000 by the Ohio State Legislature made the intensification possible. The Division of Forestry and Reclamation of the Ohio Department of Natural Resources and the U.S.D.A. Forest Service planned the resurvey. Carl E. Mayer, project leader, directed the resurvey. Joseph E. Barnard was in charge of computing and tabulating all inventory data, including those for the Wayne National Forest, which were collected by personnel of the Eastern Region of the U.S.D.A. Forest Service. Members of the Northeastern Forest Experiment Station's survey unit collected the basic inventory data for all lands outside the Wayne National Forest. With the assistance of Division of Forestry and Reclamation personnel, they collected timber cut and timber products output data. The field work was completed in December 1967. We acknowledge, with special thanks the cooperation of the Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service, who provided up-to-date aerial photographs for use in the resurvey.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This report presents 1967 forest resource statistics for the Hill Country-Ohio's portion of Appalachia. The Hill Country comprises 28 counties, which were divided into three geographic sampling units for this survey. The Hill Country of the 1952 Ohio forest survey contained 26 of these counties. The additional Appalachia counties are Brown and Clermont in the South-Central Geographic Unit. The Southeastern and East-Central Units are the same as they were in the first survey. To facilitate making comparisons between inventories, we have adjusted 1952 Hill Country data to include Brown and Clermont Counties. The resurvey of Ohio forests is part of the nationwide program to maintain a current inventory of our timber resources, as authorized by the McSweeney-McNary Forest Research Act of 1928. Because forestry is so important in the Hill Country, the resurvey there was intensified to obtain more precise county information. The appropriation of $75,000 by the Ohio State Legislature made the intensification possible. The Division of Forestry and Reclamation of the Ohio Department of Natural Resources and the U.S.D.A. Forest Service planned the resurvey. Carl E. Mayer, project leader, directed the resurvey. Joseph E. Barnard was in charge of computing and tabulating all inventory data, including those for the Wayne National Forest, which were collected by personnel of the Eastern Region of the U.S.D.A. Forest Service. Members of the Northeastern Forest Experiment Station's survey unit collected the basic inventory data for all lands outside the Wayne National Forest. With the assistance of Division of Forestry and Reclamation personnel, they collected timber cut and timber products output data. The field work was completed in December 1967. We acknowledge, with special thanks the cooperation of the Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service, who provided up-to-date aerial photographs for use in the resurvey.

Key concepts: Appalachia, Geography, Unit (ring theory), Forestry, Service (business), Environmental protection, Business, Paleontology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Timber Resources of the Ohio Hill Country — Research Paper | ScholarLens