1997PubMedRequires access

Two different hard palate closure techniques in two-stage palatoplasty: effects on velopharyngeal closure and articulation.

Ryuzaburo Tanino, Masaki Nishimura, M. Miyasaka, Tadashi Akamatsu, Yasunobu Sakuma, Michiko Inaeda, Michiya OSADA

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Two different hard palate closure techniques, in two-stage palatoplasty, was evaluated in 12 patients. The lip and soft palate were closed at 3 to 7 months of age. The patients were then divided into two groups of six and the hard palate closed at 17 to 23 months of age, either by a vomer flap (VF) with a skin graft (Osada's two-stage palatoplasty) in the VF group, or by the push-back (PB) procedure of the mucoperiosteal flap in the PB group. Velopharyngeal closure (VPC) during a gag reflex before and after hard palate closure, and the articulation of these patients after closure, were evaluated and compared between the two groups. Regarding VPC before hard palate closure, three "Poor" and three "Borderline" outcomes were noted in each group. We conclude that, by introducing the pharyngeal flap, the patients in the VF group obtained good articulation, actually comparable to that in the PB group.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Two different hard palate closure techniques, in two-stage palatoplasty, was evaluated in 12 patients. The lip and soft palate were closed at 3 to 7 months of age. The patients were then divided into two groups of six and the hard palate closed at 17 to 23 months of age, either by a vomer flap (VF) with a skin graft (Osada's two-stage palatoplasty) in the VF group, or by the push-back (PB) procedure of the mucoperiosteal flap in the PB group. Velopharyngeal closure (VPC) during a gag reflex before and after hard palate closure, and the articulation of these patients after closure, were evaluated and compared between the two groups. Regarding VPC before hard palate closure, three "Poor" and three "Borderline" outcomes were noted in each group. We conclude that, by introducing the pharyngeal flap, the patients in the VF group obtained good articulation, actually comparable to that in the PB group.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Two different hard palate closure techniques, in two-stage palatoplasty, was evaluated in 12 patients. The lip and soft palate were closed at 3 to 7 months of age. The patients were then divided into two groups of six and the hard palate closed at 17 to 23 months of age, either by a vomer flap (VF) with a skin graft (Osada's two-stage palatoplasty) in the VF group, or by the push-back (PB) procedure of the mucoperiosteal flap in the PB group. Velopharyngeal closure (VPC) during a gag reflex before and after hard palate closure, and the articulation of these patients after closure, were evaluated and compared between the two groups. Regarding VPC before hard palate closure, three "Poor" and three "Borderline" outcomes were noted in each group. We conclude that, by introducing the pharyngeal flap, the patients in the VF group obtained good articulation, actually comparable to that in the PB group.

Key concepts: Palatoplasty, Vomer, Medicine, Hard palate, Soft palate, Articulation (sociology), Closure (psychology), Pharyngeal flap

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Two different hard palate closure techniques in two-stage palatoplasty: effects on velopharyngeal closure and articulation. — Research Paper | ScholarLens