2003University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas)Open access

Digital Rights and Fair Use in Copyright Law

Robin Jeweler

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

Consumers have never been as deeply involved in the nuances of copyright law and as directly impacted by copyright infringement litigation as they are today. As a consequence of litigation, popular means of access to digital entertainment media may be foreclosed or dramatically altered. While the public audience for digital "consumption" of entertainment grows, the law and technology increasingly focus on digital means to protect copyright interests because of the great risk of piracy inherent in digital media exchanged over the Internet. Consumers have reacted vociferously to new limitations imposed or proposed by new technological constraints. Many content users argue that new limitations on access to copyrighted materials impair their right to "fair use." But the contours of fair use as personal, noncommercial use by end users, i.e., consumers, in a digital environment and over the Internet have not been fully established or articulated by the courts. Arguably, this process is in its early stages. This report examines judicial case law which has considered the doctrine of fair use in relation to the First Amendment, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, and as a means of protecting private, noncommercial use of digital music and film by consumers. It concludes that when the potential to infringe is great, as it almost always will be in a digital environment, the courts have not been willing to expand fair use to encompass subsidiary uses such as time shifting, space shifting, or personal noncommercial use.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Consumers have never been as deeply involved in the nuances of copyright law and as directly impacted by copyright infringement litigation as they are today. As a consequence of litigation, popular means of access to digital entertainment media may be foreclosed or dramatically altered. While the public audience for digital "consumption" of entertainment grows, the law and technology increasingly focus on digital means to protect copyright interests because of the great risk of piracy inherent in digital media exchanged over the Internet. Consumers have reacted vociferously to new limitations imposed or proposed by new technological constraints. Many content users argue that new limitations on access to copyrighted materials impair their right to "fair use." But the contours of fair use as personal, noncommercial use by end users, i.e., consumers, in a digital environment and over the Internet have not been fully established or articulated by the courts. Arguably, this process is in its early stages. This report examines judicial case law which has considered the doctrine of fair use in relation to the First Amendment, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, and as a means of protecting private, noncommercial use of digital music and film by consumers. It concludes that when the potential to infringe is great, as it almost always will be in a digital environment, the courts have not been willing to expand fair use to encompass subsidiary uses such as time shifting, space shifting, or personal noncommercial use.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Consumers have never been as deeply involved in the nuances of copyright law and as directly impacted by copyright infringement litigation as they are today. As a consequence of litigation, popular means of access to digital entertainment media may be foreclosed or dramatically altered. While the public audience for digital "consumption" of entertainment grows, the law and technology increasingly focus on digital means to protect copyright interests because of the great risk of piracy inherent in digital media exchanged over the Internet. Consumers have reacted vociferously to new limitations imposed or proposed by new technological constraints. Many content users argue that new limitations on access to copyrighted materials impair their right to "fair use." But the contours of fair use as personal, noncommercial use by end users, i.e., consumers, in a digital environment and over the Internet have not been fully established or articulated by the courts. Arguably, this process is in its early stages. This report examines judicial case law which has considered the doctrine of fair use in relation to the First Amendment, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, and as a means of protecting private, noncommercial use of digital music and film by consumers. It concludes that when the potential to infringe is great, as it almost always will be in a digital environment, the courts have not been willing to expand fair use to encompass subsidiary uses such as time shifting, space shifting, or personal noncommercial use.

Key concepts: Fair use, Copyright law, Digital Millennium Copyright Act, Doctrine, Fair dealing, Law, Public domain, Relation (database)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Digital Rights and Fair Use in Copyright Law — Research Paper | ScholarLens