2001Education nextRequires access

A Work in Progress: Michigan's Potent Combination of Interdistrict Choice and Charter Schooling Is Forcing Traditional Public Schools to Take Notice. Whether They Respond Is Often a Different Story. (Forum)

David Arsen, David N. Plank, Gary Sykes

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Between the traffic reports and familiar pop songs, drive-time radio in Lansing, Michigan's capital city, has a new feature: slickly produced advertisements for the East Lansing Public Schools. With the number of children living in East Lansing declining, school administrators have become increasingly aggressive in their efforts to attract students and the state dollars that come with them. They have been joined by a host of other education providers--public school districts, for-profit management firms, charter schools, and private schools--trumpeting their virtues in an increasingly crowded and competitive market for schooling. After five years, school choice is beginning to have visible effects in Michigan's education system. Parents can choose among a wide variety of charter schools, school districts besides their own, and private schools, and they are taking advantage of these choices. Some school districts are losing substantial shares of their enrollment; others are trying to bolster their funding streams by wooing students from other districts or private schools. Some charter schools are thriving; others are struggling due to mismanagement or a lack of interest. Schools and school districts increasingly recognize that their financial health-- and ultimately their survival--depends on their ability to attract and retain students, The proliferation of billboards and radio spots advertising the virtues of specific schools and school districts reflects a new sense of urgency. How does the emerging market for schooling work in Michigan? We find little evidence of systemic improvement so far, Rather, we find that the interaction of local factors and statewide rules is producing a variable yet patterned set of effects in different parts of the state. In our view, the balance between positive and negative effects depends on the details of policy design. In essence, the rules matter. Harnessing market forces may be a useful strategy for improving public schools, if policymakers are careful to get the incentives right. Simply unleashing the market may do as much harm as good. A Competitive Environment Michigan's system of school finance has created a highly favorable setting for studying the reactions of schools and school districts to competition. Since 1994, virtually all operating revenue for Michigan school districts and charter schools has been distributed by the state on a per-pupil basis. The only option for those who seek to increase revenue is to attract more students, Competition for students in Michigan is a zero-sum game; one school's gain is another's loss. In the meantime, the state has expanded the choices available to parents through both charter schooling and interdistrict choice plans. During the 2000--01 school year, 185 charter schools enrolled about 60,000 students in Michigan. Another 26,000 students enrolled in public schools outside their home district under the state's interdistrict choice program (see Figure 1). Some important new players in the education system are education management organizations (EMO), such as National Heritage Academies and Edison Schools. Suchx entities now manage about 70 percent of Michigan's charter schools and some traditional public schools as well. They compete against one another not only in the marketplace for student enrollment, but also in the political arena, where chartering authorities decide which proposed schools will receive charters. Roughly 5 percent of all students take advantage of school choice in Michigan, but the rate varies substantially from district to district. Detroit Public Schools has lost 10 percent of its resident students to charter schools and neighboring school districts, shaving $100 million off the district's annual operating budget. Some districts have lost more than a quarter of their students to charter schools and neighboring school districts. Others have benefited from choice, gaining students and funding. …

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Between the traffic reports and familiar pop songs, drive-time radio in Lansing, Michigan's capital city, has a new feature: slickly produced advertisements for the East Lansing Public Schools. With the number of children living in East Lansing declining, school administrators have become increasingly aggressive in their efforts to attract students and the state dollars that come with them. They have been joined by a host of other education providers--public school districts, for-profit management firms, charter schools, and private schools--trumpeting their virtues in an increasingly crowded and competitive market for schooling. After five years, school choice is beginning to have visible effects in Michigan's education system. Parents can choose among a wide variety of charter schools, school districts besides their own, and private schools, and they are taking advantage of these choices. Some school districts are losing substantial shares of their enrollment; others are trying to bolster their funding streams by wooing students from other districts or private schools. Some charter schools are thriving; others are struggling due to mismanagement or a lack of interest. Schools and school districts increasingly recognize that their financial health-- and ultimately their survival--depends on their ability to attract and retain students, The proliferation of billboards and radio spots advertising the virtues of specific schools and school districts reflects a new sense of urgency. How does the emerging market for schooling work in Michigan? We find little evidence of systemic improvement so far, Rather, we find that the interaction of local factors and statewide rules is producing a variable yet patterned set of effects in different parts of the state. In our view, the balance between positive and negative effects depends on the details of policy design. In essence, the rules matter. Harnessing market forces may be a useful strategy for improving public schools, if policymakers are careful to get the incentives right. Simply unleashing the market may do as much harm as good. A Competitive Environment Michigan's system of school finance has created a highly favorable setting for studying the reactions of schools and school districts to competition. Since 1994, virtually all operating revenue for Michigan school districts and charter schools has been distributed by the state on a per-pupil basis. The only option for those who seek to increase revenue is to attract more students, Competition for students in Michigan is a zero-sum game; one school's gain is another's loss. In the meantime, the state has expanded the choices available to parents through both charter schooling and interdistrict choice plans. During the 2000--01 school year, 185 charter schools enrolled about 60,000 students in Michigan. Another 26,000 students enrolled in public schools outside their home district under the state's interdistrict choice program (see Figure 1). Some important new players in the education system are education management organizations (EMO), such as National Heritage Academies and Edison Schools. Suchx entities now manage about 70 percent of Michigan's charter schools and some traditional public schools as well. They compete against one another not only in the marketplace for student enrollment, but also in the political arena, where chartering authorities decide which proposed schools will receive charters. Roughly 5 percent of all students take advantage of school choice in Michigan, but the rate varies substantially from district to district. Detroit Public Schools has lost 10 percent of its resident students to charter schools and neighboring school districts, shaving $100 million off the district's annual operating budget. Some districts have lost more than a quarter of their students to charter schools and neighboring school districts. Others have benefited from choice, gaining students and funding. …

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Between the traffic reports and familiar pop songs, drive-time radio in Lansing, Michigan's capital city, has a new feature: slickly produced advertisements for the East Lansing Public Schools. With the number of children living in East Lansing declining, school administrators have become increasingly aggressive in their efforts to attract students and the state dollars that come with them. They have been joined by a host of other education providers--public school districts, for-profit management firms, charter schools, and private schools--trumpeting their virtues in an increasingly crowded and competitive market for schooling. After five years, school choice is beginning to have visible effects in Michigan's education system. Parents can choose among a wide variety of charter schools, school districts besides their own, and private schools, and they are taking advantage of these choices. Some school districts are losing substantial shares of their enrollment; others are trying to bolster their funding streams by wooing students from other districts or private schools. Some charter schools are thriving; others are struggling due to mismanagement or a lack of interest. Schools and school districts increasingly recognize that their financial health-- and ultimately their survival--depends on their ability to attract and retain students, The proliferation of billboards and radio spots advertising the virtues of specific schools and school districts reflects a new sense of urgency. How does the emerging market for schooling work in Michigan? We find little evidence of systemic improvement so far, Rather, we find that the interaction of local factors and statewide rules is producing a variable yet patterned set of effects in different parts of the state. In our view, the balance between positive and negative effects depends on the details of policy design. In essence, the rules matter. Harnessing market forces may be a useful strategy for improving public schools, if policymakers are careful to get the incentives right. Simply unleashing the market may do as much harm as good. A Competitive Environment Michigan's system of school finance has created a highly favorable setting for studying the reactions of schools and school districts to competition. Since 1994, virtually all operating revenue for Michigan school districts and charter schools has been distributed by the state on a per-pupil basis. The only option for those who seek to increase revenue is to attract more students, Competition for students in Michigan is a zero-sum game; one school's gain is another's loss. In the meantime, the state has expanded the choices available to parents through both charter schooling and interdistrict choice plans. During the 2000--01 school year, 185 charter schools enrolled about 60,000 students in Michigan. Another 26,000 students enrolled in public schools outside their home district under the state's interdistrict choice program (see Figure 1). Some important new players in the education system are education management organizations (EMO), such as National Heritage Academies and Edison Schools. Suchx entities now manage about 70 percent of Michigan's charter schools and some traditional public schools as well. They compete against one another not only in the marketplace for student enrollment, but also in the political arena, where chartering authorities decide which proposed schools will receive charters. Roughly 5 percent of all students take advantage of school choice in Michigan, but the rate varies substantially from district to district. Detroit Public Schools has lost 10 percent of its resident students to charter schools and neighboring school districts, shaving $100 million off the district's annual operating budget. Some districts have lost more than a quarter of their students to charter schools and neighboring school districts. Others have benefited from choice, gaining students and funding. …

Key concepts: Charter, School choice, Thriving, Notice, Public relations, Alternative education, Sociology, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Work in Progress: Michigan's Potent Combination of Interdistrict Choice and Charter Schooling Is Forcing Traditional Public Schools to Take Notice. Whether They Respond Is Often a Different Story. (Forum) — Research Paper | ScholarLens