2002Birkhäuser Basel eBooksRequires access

Hidden Symmetry and Genericity

Martin Golubitsky, Ian Nicholas Stewart

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In Chapter 6 we discussed ways in which symmetries can be modeling assumptions in physical systems, and we framed this discussion specifically in terms of models of the Couette-Taylor experiment and the Belousov-Zhabotinskii experiment. We saw that symmetries may be exact, at least for modeling purposes, or they may be approximate. In models of the Couette-Taylor experiment, approximate symmetries appear because we assume periodic boundary conditions in the axial direction; in models of the Belousov-Zhabotinskii experiment they appear because we assume an infinitely large domain. We saw that model-independent results — those that depend only on the symmetries of the model — tell us a great deal about transitions that are actually seen in experiments. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In Chapter 6 we discussed ways in which symmetries can be modeling assumptions in physical systems, and we framed this discussion specifically in terms of models of the Couette-Taylor experiment and the Belousov-Zhabotinskii experiment. We saw that symmetries may be exact, at least for modeling purposes, or they may be approximate. In models of the Couette-Taylor experiment, approximate symmetries appear because we assume periodic boundary conditions in the axial direction; in models of the Belousov-Zhabotinskii experiment they appear because we assume an infinitely large domain. We saw that model-independent results — those that depend only on the symmetries of the model — tell us a great deal about transitions that are actually seen in experiments. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In Chapter 6 we discussed ways in which symmetries can be modeling assumptions in physical systems, and we framed this discussion specifically in terms of models of the Couette-Taylor experiment and the Belousov-Zhabotinskii experiment. We saw that symmetries may be exact, at least for modeling purposes, or they may be approximate. In models of the Couette-Taylor experiment, approximate symmetries appear because we assume periodic boundary conditions in the axial direction; in models of the Belousov-Zhabotinskii experiment they appear because we assume an infinitely large domain. We saw that model-independent results — those that depend only on the symmetries of the model — tell us a great deal about transitions that are actually seen in experiments. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Key concepts: Homogeneous space, Symmetry (geometry), Domain (mathematical analysis), Theoretical physics, Boundary (topology), Physics, Boundary value problem, Statistical physics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Hidden Symmetry and Genericity — Research Paper | ScholarLens