Antitrust and Higher Education: What Hath Justice Wrought?
Donald Gould
Abstract
Open-access reader
Donald Gould
Abstract
Open-access reader
The MIT case signals a new era for higher education. Colleges and universities must now conduct their activities in compliance with the antitrust laws. The recent Amendments to the Higher Education Act offer a limited antitrust immunity for certain collective financial aid activities, but all other aspects of higher education are now subject to antitrust scrutiny. As a likely result, prudent college and university officials will adopt antitrust compliance programs to protect against inadvertent antitrust violations that could expose their institutions to private treble damage litigation, or worse.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The MIT case signals a new era for higher education. Colleges and universities must now conduct their activities in compliance with the antitrust laws. The recent Amendments to the Higher Education Act offer a limited antitrust immunity for certain collective financial aid activities, but all other aspects of higher education are now subject to antitrust scrutiny. As a likely result, prudent college and university officials will adopt antitrust compliance programs to protect against inadvertent antitrust violations that could expose their institutions to private treble damage litigation, or worse.
Key concepts: Scrutiny, Higher education, Compliance (psychology), Consent decree, Subject (documents), Economic Justice, Law, Business