1986•NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA)Open access

Methods for assessing wall interference in the 2- by 2-foot adaptive-wall wind tunnel

Edward T. Schairer

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Discussed are two methods for assessing two-dimensional wall interference in the adaptive-wall test section of the NASA Ames 2 x 2-Foot Transonic Wind Tunnel: (1) a method for predicting free-air conditions near the walls of the test section (adaptive-wall methods); and (2) a method for estimating wall-induced velocities near the model (correction methods), both of which methods are based on measurements of either one or two components of flow velocity near the walls of the test section. Each method is demonstrated using simulated wind tunnel data and is compared with other methods of the same type. The two-component adaptive-wall and correction methods were found to be preferable to the corresponding one-component methods because: (1) they are more sensitive to, and give a more complete description of, wall interference; (2) they require measurements at fewer locations; (3) they can be used to establish free-stream conditions; and (4) they are independent of a description of the model and constants of integration.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Discussed are two methods for assessing two-dimensional wall interference in the adaptive-wall test section of the NASA Ames 2 x 2-Foot Transonic Wind Tunnel: (1) a method for predicting free-air conditions near the walls of the test section (adaptive-wall methods); and (2) a method for estimating wall-induced velocities near the model (correction methods), both of which methods are based on measurements of either one or two components of flow velocity near the walls of the test section. Each method is demonstrated using simulated wind tunnel data and is compared with other methods of the same type. The two-component adaptive-wall and correction methods were found to be preferable to the corresponding one-component methods because: (1) they are more sensitive to, and give a more complete description of, wall interference; (2) they require measurements at fewer locations; (3) they can be used to establish free-stream conditions; and (4) they are independent of a description of the model and constants of integration.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Discussed are two methods for assessing two-dimensional wall interference in the adaptive-wall test section of the NASA Ames 2 x 2-Foot Transonic Wind Tunnel: (1) a method for predicting free-air conditions near the walls of the test section (adaptive-wall methods); and (2) a method for estimating wall-induced velocities near the model (correction methods), both of which methods are based on measurements of either one or two components of flow velocity near the walls of the test section. Each method is demonstrated using simulated wind tunnel data and is compared with other methods of the same type. The two-component adaptive-wall and correction methods were found to be preferable to the corresponding one-component methods because: (1) they are more sensitive to, and give a more complete description of, wall interference; (2) they require measurements at fewer locations; (3) they can be used to establish free-stream conditions; and (4) they are independent of a description of the model and constants of integration.

Key concepts: Wind tunnel, Interference (communication), Transonic, Mechanics, Structural engineering, Marine engineering, Engineering, Physics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Methods for assessing wall interference in the 2- by 2-foot adaptive-wall wind tunnel — Research Paper | ScholarLens