2002PsycEXTRA DatasetRequires access

Information Operations: The Need for a National Strategy

Samuel P. Morthland

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

This thesis explores the hypothesis that a national information strategy would enhance military effectiveness and national security. Analysis of the role of information in conflict, a definition of what information is, and how it can be used to support military operations establishes the foundation for the thesis. Perception management, system destruction, and information exploitation are identified as key elements of to an effective strategy. They are reflected in the 17 information operational capabilities in joint doctrine. Four categories were created to differentiate the 10 capabilities along offense/defense and technological/cognitive lines. The current focus of 10 in the U.S. is the technical/offensive 10 category, with less attention being given to the conceptual/ cognitive category. This may be due to a lack of strategic 10 planning. Therefore, a planning methodology is developed herein and used to analyze the Administration's response to the terrorist attacks on 9/11/2001. A detailed analysis of the 10 capabilities used identified two shortcomings: the failure to identify all key audiences, and not considering all the 10 capabilities available. The thesis recommends adopting the concepts of a National Information Strategy and the 10 strategic planning methodology used in the study.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This thesis explores the hypothesis that a national information strategy would enhance military effectiveness and national security. Analysis of the role of information in conflict, a definition of what information is, and how it can be used to support military operations establishes the foundation for the thesis. Perception management, system destruction, and information exploitation are identified as key elements of to an effective strategy. They are reflected in the 17 information operational capabilities in joint doctrine. Four categories were created to differentiate the 10 capabilities along offense/defense and technological/cognitive lines. The current focus of 10 in the U.S. is the technical/offensive 10 category, with less attention being given to the conceptual/ cognitive category. This may be due to a lack of strategic 10 planning. Therefore, a planning methodology is developed herein and used to analyze the Administration's response to the terrorist attacks on 9/11/2001. A detailed analysis of the 10 capabilities used identified two shortcomings: the failure to identify all key audiences, and not considering all the 10 capabilities available. The thesis recommends adopting the concepts of a National Information Strategy and the 10 strategic planning methodology used in the study.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This thesis explores the hypothesis that a national information strategy would enhance military effectiveness and national security. Analysis of the role of information in conflict, a definition of what information is, and how it can be used to support military operations establishes the foundation for the thesis. Perception management, system destruction, and information exploitation are identified as key elements of to an effective strategy. They are reflected in the 17 information operational capabilities in joint doctrine. Four categories were created to differentiate the 10 capabilities along offense/defense and technological/cognitive lines. The current focus of 10 in the U.S. is the technical/offensive 10 category, with less attention being given to the conceptual/ cognitive category. This may be due to a lack of strategic 10 planning. Therefore, a planning methodology is developed herein and used to analyze the Administration's response to the terrorist attacks on 9/11/2001. A detailed analysis of the 10 capabilities used identified two shortcomings: the failure to identify all key audiences, and not considering all the 10 capabilities available. The thesis recommends adopting the concepts of a National Information Strategy and the 10 strategic planning methodology used in the study.

Key concepts: Offensive, Military strategy, National security, Military doctrine, Information Operations, Strategic planning, Doctrine, Process management

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Information Operations: The Need for a National Strategy — Research Paper | ScholarLens