1977Unpublished venueRequires access

A Comparison Between a Simple Drag Formula and Experimental Drag Data for Bodies of Revolution

Nadine M. White

Open publisher page 24 citations

Abstract

Abstract : A simplified drag formula to predict the drag of a small number of axisymmetric forms is systematically applied to seven series of model forms comprising nearly fifty bodies. Calculations of form (or residual) drag are compared to available experimental data in order to determine the usefulness of the method for predictive purposes. The formula is shown to exhibit very little sensitivity to changes in most body parameters such as the length-of-stern to diameter ratio, nose and tail radii parameters, and the prismatic coefficient. For some parameters, such as length to diameter ratio, the length of bow section to diameter ratio, however, the formula is sometimes able to discriminate bodies having high values of form drag. It is concluded that the simple drag formula may not be reliably used for estimating the relative form drags of bodies of revolution.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract : A simplified drag formula to predict the drag of a small number of axisymmetric forms is systematically applied to seven series of model forms comprising nearly fifty bodies. Calculations of form (or residual) drag are compared to available experimental data in order to determine the usefulness of the method for predictive purposes. The formula is shown to exhibit very little sensitivity to changes in most body parameters such as the length-of-stern to diameter ratio, nose and tail radii parameters, and the prismatic coefficient. For some parameters, such as length to diameter ratio, the length of bow section to diameter ratio, however, the formula is sometimes able to discriminate bodies having high values of form drag. It is concluded that the simple drag formula may not be reliably used for estimating the relative form drags of bodies of revolution.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 24 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract : A simplified drag formula to predict the drag of a small number of axisymmetric forms is systematically applied to seven series of model forms comprising nearly fifty bodies. Calculations of form (or residual) drag are compared to available experimental data in order to determine the usefulness of the method for predictive purposes. The formula is shown to exhibit very little sensitivity to changes in most body parameters such as the length-of-stern to diameter ratio, nose and tail radii parameters, and the prismatic coefficient. For some parameters, such as length to diameter ratio, the length of bow section to diameter ratio, however, the formula is sometimes able to discriminate bodies having high values of form drag. It is concluded that the simple drag formula may not be reliably used for estimating the relative form drags of bodies of revolution.

Key concepts: Drag, Simple (philosophy), Drag coefficient, Mechanics, Physics, Mathematics, Philosophy, Epistemology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Comparison Between a Simple Drag Formula and Experimental Drag Data for Bodies of Revolution — Research Paper | ScholarLens