1970Forest ScienceOpen access

Stand Density Measures: An Interpretation

Robert O. Curtis

Open full text 123 citations

Abstract

Abstract Many stand density measures can be regarded as expressions of average area available to trees of a stand, relative to that occupied by trees growing under a standard density condition and comparable in dbh or otherwise. Relationships among a number of common relative stand density measures are discussed. Either the open-grown condition or the normal stand can be used as the standard and lead to similar results. Differences are introduced by use of stand diameter, height, volume, or site and age as alternative bases for referring observed stands to the standard condition. A ratio of observed basal area to that of a normal stand of the same age and site, frequently used as an expression of relative density, is not directly interpretable as a comparison of areas. Otherwise, most common measures appear to be practically equivalent. Forest Sci. 16:403-414.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Many stand density measures can be regarded as expressions of average area available to trees of a stand, relative to that occupied by trees growing under a standard density condition and comparable in dbh or otherwise. Relationships among a number of common relative stand density measures are discussed. Either the open-grown condition or the normal stand can be used as the standard and lead to similar results. Differences are introduced by use of stand diameter, height, volume, or site and age as alternative bases for referring observed stands to the standard condition. A ratio of observed basal area to that of a normal stand of the same age and site, frequently used as an expression of relative density, is not directly interpretable as a comparison of areas. Otherwise, most common measures appear to be practically equivalent. Forest Sci. 16:403-414.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 123 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Many stand density measures can be regarded as expressions of average area available to trees of a stand, relative to that occupied by trees growing under a standard density condition and comparable in dbh or otherwise. Relationships among a number of common relative stand density measures are discussed. Either the open-grown condition or the normal stand can be used as the standard and lead to similar results. Differences are introduced by use of stand diameter, height, volume, or site and age as alternative bases for referring observed stands to the standard condition. A ratio of observed basal area to that of a normal stand of the same age and site, frequently used as an expression of relative density, is not directly interpretable as a comparison of areas. Otherwise, most common measures appear to be practically equivalent. Forest Sci. 16:403-414.

Key concepts: Interpretation (philosophy), Environmental science, Statistics, Geography, Forestry, Mathematics, Computer science, Programming language

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Stand Density Measures: An Interpretation — Research Paper | ScholarLens