Stand Density Measures: An Interpretation
Robert O. Curtis
Abstract
Robert O. Curtis
Abstract
Abstract Many stand density measures can be regarded as expressions of average area available to trees of a stand, relative to that occupied by trees growing under a standard density condition and comparable in dbh or otherwise. Relationships among a number of common relative stand density measures are discussed. Either the open-grown condition or the normal stand can be used as the standard and lead to similar results. Differences are introduced by use of stand diameter, height, volume, or site and age as alternative bases for referring observed stands to the standard condition. A ratio of observed basal area to that of a normal stand of the same age and site, frequently used as an expression of relative density, is not directly interpretable as a comparison of areas. Otherwise, most common measures appear to be practically equivalent. Forest Sci. 16:403-414.
OpenAlex reports 123 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract Many stand density measures can be regarded as expressions of average area available to trees of a stand, relative to that occupied by trees growing under a standard density condition and comparable in dbh or otherwise. Relationships among a number of common relative stand density measures are discussed. Either the open-grown condition or the normal stand can be used as the standard and lead to similar results. Differences are introduced by use of stand diameter, height, volume, or site and age as alternative bases for referring observed stands to the standard condition. A ratio of observed basal area to that of a normal stand of the same age and site, frequently used as an expression of relative density, is not directly interpretable as a comparison of areas. Otherwise, most common measures appear to be practically equivalent. Forest Sci. 16:403-414.
Key concepts: Interpretation (philosophy), Environmental science, Statistics, Geography, Forestry, Mathematics, Computer science, Programming language