A Study of the Determinants of Australian Audit Committee Effectiveness
Sherrena Buckby, Keitha Dunstan, Robert Savage
Abstract
Sherrena Buckby, Keitha Dunstan, Robert Savage
Abstract
Despite continued promotion of audit committees by professional and regulatory bodies as a desirable corporate governance mechanism, limited research has addressed the effectiveness of audit committees or the factors associated with audit committee effectiveness. The purpose of this study is to develop a composite measure of audit committee effectiveness and to investigate the association between five audit committee characteristics and effectiveness. Following the method adopted by Spangler & Braiotta [1990] and Kalbers & Fogarty [1993], effectiveness was measured using a composite of survey responses from the audit committee chairperson, a non-executive director and the internal audit manager of a sample of Australian publicly listed corporations. The independence of audit committee members, the provision of training to audit committee members and the knowledge and experience of audit committee members were found to be related to audit committee effectiveness. Other audit committee characteristics were not significantly associated with effectiveness, suggesting a need for further empirical investigation.
OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Despite continued promotion of audit committees by professional and regulatory bodies as a desirable corporate governance mechanism, limited research has addressed the effectiveness of audit committees or the factors associated with audit committee effectiveness. The purpose of this study is to develop a composite measure of audit committee effectiveness and to investigate the association between five audit committee characteristics and effectiveness. Following the method adopted by Spangler & Braiotta [1990] and Kalbers & Fogarty [1993], effectiveness was measured using a composite of survey responses from the audit committee chairperson, a non-executive director and the internal audit manager of a sample of Australian publicly listed corporations. The independence of audit committee members, the provision of training to audit committee members and the knowledge and experience of audit committee members were found to be related to audit committee effectiveness. Other audit committee characteristics were not significantly associated with effectiveness, suggesting a need for further empirical investigation.
Key concepts: Audit committee, Chief audit executive, Audit evidence, Joint audit, Internal audit, Audit plan, Accounting, Audit