1986Final ReportRequires access

Sound Power Measurements in Air in the Near Field of Sound Sources Using the Sound Intensity Method.

John R. Polak

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract : Sound power is the acoustic energy output in watts of a sound-producing source. Sound power can be determined with an array of pressure sensing transducers placed around a source in an anechoic chamber, as specified in standard 3744-1981 (E). In contrast, sound intensity can be used to measure sound power by measuring the intensity output of the source in watts/sq. m. over a closed surface and using the definition of sound power (intensity X area) to find sound power. Advantages of the sound intensity method are that one measuring probe is used, which consists of two closely placed pressure sensing transducers: no anechoic chamber is needed; measurements can be done in the near field; and background noise can be present. Disadvantages are that: no standards exist yet; and the phase response between the two transducers in the probe must match closely, either through quality transducers or by careful calibration. The two methods of determining sound power were systematically compared. Tests showed that the sound power results from the sound intensity method, even in fairly adverse environments, were comparable to results obtained using the ISO method in most situations.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract : Sound power is the acoustic energy output in watts of a sound-producing source. Sound power can be determined with an array of pressure sensing transducers placed around a source in an anechoic chamber, as specified in standard 3744-1981 (E). In contrast, sound intensity can be used to measure sound power by measuring the intensity output of the source in watts/sq. m. over a closed surface and using the definition of sound power (intensity X area) to find sound power. Advantages of the sound intensity method are that one measuring probe is used, which consists of two closely placed pressure sensing transducers: no anechoic chamber is needed; measurements can be done in the near field; and background noise can be present. Disadvantages are that: no standards exist yet; and the phase response between the two transducers in the probe must match closely, either through quality transducers or by careful calibration. The two methods of determining sound power were systematically compared. Tests showed that the sound power results from the sound intensity method, even in fairly adverse environments, were comparable to results obtained using the ISO method in most situations.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract : Sound power is the acoustic energy output in watts of a sound-producing source. Sound power can be determined with an array of pressure sensing transducers placed around a source in an anechoic chamber, as specified in standard 3744-1981 (E). In contrast, sound intensity can be used to measure sound power by measuring the intensity output of the source in watts/sq. m. over a closed surface and using the definition of sound power (intensity X area) to find sound power. Advantages of the sound intensity method are that one measuring probe is used, which consists of two closely placed pressure sensing transducers: no anechoic chamber is needed; measurements can be done in the near field; and background noise can be present. Disadvantages are that: no standards exist yet; and the phase response between the two transducers in the probe must match closely, either through quality transducers or by careful calibration. The two methods of determining sound power were systematically compared. Tests showed that the sound power results from the sound intensity method, even in fairly adverse environments, were comparable to results obtained using the ISO method in most situations.

Key concepts: Sound intensity, Sound power, Acoustics, Sound intensity probe, Sound pressure, Anechoic chamber, Acoustic source localization, Reverberation room

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Sound Power Measurements in Air in the Near Field of Sound Sources Using the Sound Intensity Method. — Research Paper | ScholarLens