1955Unpublished venueRequires access

Flight Determination of the Longitudinal Stability and Control Characteristics of a 0.125-Scale Rocket-Boosted Model of the Mcdonnell F-101 Airplane at Mach Numbers from 0.82 to 1.84

E. C. Hastings, Grady L. Mitcham

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

A flight test has been conducted to determine the longitudinal stability and control characteristics of a 0.125-scale model of the McDonnell F-1OlA airplane for the Mach number range between 0.82 and 1.84. The variation of lift-curve slope with Mach number was gradual with a maximum value of 0.107 occurring at a Mach number of 0.95. The minimum drag coefficient (including base and internal drag) has a value of 0.020 at a Mach number of 0.87. The drag rise begins at a Mach number of 0.90, and at Mach number of 1.10 the minimum drag is 0.070. Above this Mach number there is a gradual increase in minimum drag coefficient to a value of 0.074 when the Mach number is 1.83. The aerodynamic-center location moved from a value of 62 percent mean aerodynamic chord at a Mach number of 0.88 to its most rearward position of 85 percent at a Mach number of 1.40. The all-movable horizontal tail remained an effective control for producing lift and pitching moment with the variation in effectiveness being gradual throughout the Mach number range covered by the test. There were no large or abrupt losses in pitch damping over the Mach number range covered.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A flight test has been conducted to determine the longitudinal stability and control characteristics of a 0.125-scale model of the McDonnell F-1OlA airplane for the Mach number range between 0.82 and 1.84. The variation of lift-curve slope with Mach number was gradual with a maximum value of 0.107 occurring at a Mach number of 0.95. The minimum drag coefficient (including base and internal drag) has a value of 0.020 at a Mach number of 0.87. The drag rise begins at a Mach number of 0.90, and at Mach number of 1.10 the minimum drag is 0.070. Above this Mach number there is a gradual increase in minimum drag coefficient to a value of 0.074 when the Mach number is 1.83. The aerodynamic-center location moved from a value of 62 percent mean aerodynamic chord at a Mach number of 0.88 to its most rearward position of 85 percent at a Mach number of 1.40. The all-movable horizontal tail remained an effective control for producing lift and pitching moment with the variation in effectiveness being gradual throughout the Mach number range covered by the test. There were no large or abrupt losses in pitch damping over the Mach number range covered.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A flight test has been conducted to determine the longitudinal stability and control characteristics of a 0.125-scale model of the McDonnell F-1OlA airplane for the Mach number range between 0.82 and 1.84. The variation of lift-curve slope with Mach number was gradual with a maximum value of 0.107 occurring at a Mach number of 0.95. The minimum drag coefficient (including base and internal drag) has a value of 0.020 at a Mach number of 0.87. The drag rise begins at a Mach number of 0.90, and at Mach number of 1.10 the minimum drag is 0.070. Above this Mach number there is a gradual increase in minimum drag coefficient to a value of 0.074 when the Mach number is 1.83. The aerodynamic-center location moved from a value of 62 percent mean aerodynamic chord at a Mach number of 0.88 to its most rearward position of 85 percent at a Mach number of 1.40. The all-movable horizontal tail remained an effective control for producing lift and pitching moment with the variation in effectiveness being gradual throughout the Mach number range covered by the test. There were no large or abrupt losses in pitch damping over the Mach number range covered.

Key concepts: Drag divergence Mach number, Mach number, Aerodynamics, Drag, Pitching moment, Longitudinal static stability, Wave drag, Mach wave

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Flight Determination of the Longitudinal Stability and Control Characteristics of a 0.125-Scale Rocket-Boosted Model of the Mcdonnell F-101 Airplane at Mach Numbers from 0.82 to 1.84 — Research Paper | ScholarLens