2012Unpublished venueRequires access

Is the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Sustainable?

Robert G. McNeil

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract : During the Cold War, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) was widely viewed as essential for the security of NATO member-states. After the Cold War, many European nations continued to look to NATO as a guarantor of their security. Post-Cold War, NATO broadened its involvement beyond Western Europe, while absorbing several states from the former Soviet Union and Warsaw Pact. NATO has evolved from an alliance that was primarily defensive in nature, and European focused, to a more globally focused defensive alliance. A question often asked since the end of the Cold War is, Can NATO be sustained? While the U.S. President has labeled NATO as the indispensable organization and former Secretary of Defense Gates have stressed its importance to both individual and global security; they also express concern about its future. NATO can be sustained. Ultimately, however, NATO itself must convince its own members that NATO is necessary for their security. Failure to do so may threaten NATO's future existence.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract : During the Cold War, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) was widely viewed as essential for the security of NATO member-states. After the Cold War, many European nations continued to look to NATO as a guarantor of their security. Post-Cold War, NATO broadened its involvement beyond Western Europe, while absorbing several states from the former Soviet Union and Warsaw Pact. NATO has evolved from an alliance that was primarily defensive in nature, and European focused, to a more globally focused defensive alliance. A question often asked since the end of the Cold War is, Can NATO be sustained? While the U.S. President has labeled NATO as the indispensable organization and former Secretary of Defense Gates have stressed its importance to both individual and global security; they also express concern about its future. NATO can be sustained. Ultimately, however, NATO itself must convince its own members that NATO is necessary for their security. Failure to do so may threaten NATO's future existence.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract : During the Cold War, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) was widely viewed as essential for the security of NATO member-states. After the Cold War, many European nations continued to look to NATO as a guarantor of their security. Post-Cold War, NATO broadened its involvement beyond Western Europe, while absorbing several states from the former Soviet Union and Warsaw Pact. NATO has evolved from an alliance that was primarily defensive in nature, and European focused, to a more globally focused defensive alliance. A question often asked since the end of the Cold War is, Can NATO be sustained? While the U.S. President has labeled NATO as the indispensable organization and former Secretary of Defense Gates have stressed its importance to both individual and global security; they also express concern about its future. NATO can be sustained. Ultimately, however, NATO itself must convince its own members that NATO is necessary for their security. Failure to do so may threaten NATO's future existence.

Key concepts: North Atlantic Treaty, Treaty, Oceanography, Political science, Geography, Geology, Archaeology, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Is the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Sustainable? — Research Paper | ScholarLens