1997Unpublished venueRequires access

Deterrence in a New Security Environment

Eugene B. Habiger

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Public debate on nuclear arms control tends to focus on numbers of weapons; the most important criterion in assessing prospective arms control measures is whether or not they contribute to stability and security. The United States and Russia have achieved many advances in arms control and strategic stability since the end of the Cold War. Radical reductions in forces or the wholesale removal of forces from alert may create situations which could be dangerously destabilizing in a crisis. States with the potential to threaten the United States and its allies continue to seek nuclear, biological and chemical weapons. The United States must be prepared to pose unacceptable risks to any potential adversary, at the moment, nuclear weapons are an indispensable part of that capability. In a way not always appreciated, America's nuclear forces also complement efforts to restrict nuclear proliferation by extending an important deterrent guarantee to our allies.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Public debate on nuclear arms control tends to focus on numbers of weapons; the most important criterion in assessing prospective arms control measures is whether or not they contribute to stability and security. The United States and Russia have achieved many advances in arms control and strategic stability since the end of the Cold War. Radical reductions in forces or the wholesale removal of forces from alert may create situations which could be dangerously destabilizing in a crisis. States with the potential to threaten the United States and its allies continue to seek nuclear, biological and chemical weapons. The United States must be prepared to pose unacceptable risks to any potential adversary, at the moment, nuclear weapons are an indispensable part of that capability. In a way not always appreciated, America's nuclear forces also complement efforts to restrict nuclear proliferation by extending an important deterrent guarantee to our allies.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Public debate on nuclear arms control tends to focus on numbers of weapons; the most important criterion in assessing prospective arms control measures is whether or not they contribute to stability and security. The United States and Russia have achieved many advances in arms control and strategic stability since the end of the Cold War. Radical reductions in forces or the wholesale removal of forces from alert may create situations which could be dangerously destabilizing in a crisis. States with the potential to threaten the United States and its allies continue to seek nuclear, biological and chemical weapons. The United States must be prepared to pose unacceptable risks to any potential adversary, at the moment, nuclear weapons are an indispensable part of that capability. In a way not always appreciated, America's nuclear forces also complement efforts to restrict nuclear proliferation by extending an important deterrent guarantee to our allies.

Key concepts: Deterrence (psychology), Computer security, Computer science, Criminology, Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Deterrence in a New Security Environment — Research Paper | ScholarLens