Devolution of resource rights, poverty, and natural resource management: a review
Priya Shyamsundar, Eduardo Araral, Suranjan Weeraratne
Abstract
Priya Shyamsundar, Eduardo Araral, Suranjan Weeraratne
Abstract
Over the last several years, the rights of local communities over natural resources have been strengthened either through power-sharing agreements with the state, increased legal access to natural resources, or decentralization within national agencies. Understanding the impacts of these institutional changes is important both for governments and other stakeholders. This paper focuses on four questions: (1) What is the scope and scale of decentralized natural resource management in different resource sectors? (2) What do we understand about the impacts of devolution, in terms of poverty reduction, resource conservation, and financial implications for governments and local agencies? (3) What are some conditions that contribute to success? (4) What does the future hold for decentralized resource management; that is, what are some emerging challenges? These questions are addressed in relation to three communal resource-management activities-community-based wildlife management, irrigation management transfer, and community forestry.
OpenAlex reports 25 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Over the last several years, the rights of local communities over natural resources have been strengthened either through power-sharing agreements with the state, increased legal access to natural resources, or decentralization within national agencies. Understanding the impacts of these institutional changes is important both for governments and other stakeholders. This paper focuses on four questions: (1) What is the scope and scale of decentralized natural resource management in different resource sectors? (2) What do we understand about the impacts of devolution, in terms of poverty reduction, resource conservation, and financial implications for governments and local agencies? (3) What are some conditions that contribute to success? (4) What does the future hold for decentralized resource management; that is, what are some emerging challenges? These questions are addressed in relation to three communal resource-management activities-community-based wildlife management, irrigation management transfer, and community forestry.
Key concepts: Devolution (biology), Natural resource management, Decentralization, Natural resource, Resource management (computing), Business, Scope (computer science), Environmental resource management