1978Unpublished venueOpen access

Economic studies of coal gasification: combined cycle systems for electric power generation. Final report

K. K. Chandra, B. McElmurry, E. W. Neben, G.E. Pack

Open full text 4 citations

Abstract

This report presents the results of economic-screening studies for several current and advanced coal-gasification processes coupled with combined-cycle power generation. The objective was to identify whether significant economic and/or environmental incentives exist for using such systems compared to the current practice of direct coal firing and stack-gas cleanup. The processes studied included the Lurgi dry-ash gasifier, the British Gas Corporation Slagger, and three entrained-bed processes offered by Combustion Engineering, Foster Wheeler, and Texaco. All these processes were integrated with combined-cycle plants based on advanced gas turbine technology (2,400/sup 0/F Combustion Outlet) estimated by Westinghouse to be available in the 1981-1985 time period. The evaluations were based on complete ''grass-roots'' facilities sized to conform to present electric utility practice of building units of approximately 1,000-MW capacity. It is concluded that several of the processes considered are potentially attractive and are, or can be, available for commercialization during the next decade. In particular, the entrained-bed processes appear to offer substantial environmental as well as economic advantages owing to their simplicity and lack of by-products. It is felt that development emphasis should be placed on compression, power generation, and heat-transfer equipment, rather than on more gasification processes.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This report presents the results of economic-screening studies for several current and advanced coal-gasification processes coupled with combined-cycle power generation. The objective was to identify whether significant economic and/or environmental incentives exist for using such systems compared to the current practice of direct coal firing and stack-gas cleanup. The processes studied included the Lurgi dry-ash gasifier, the British Gas Corporation Slagger, and three entrained-bed processes offered by Combustion Engineering, Foster Wheeler, and Texaco. All these processes were integrated with combined-cycle plants based on advanced gas turbine technology (2,400/sup 0/F Combustion Outlet) estimated by Westinghouse to be available in the 1981-1985 time period. The evaluations were based on complete ''grass-roots'' facilities sized to conform to present electric utility practice of building units of approximately 1,000-MW capacity. It is concluded that several of the processes considered are potentially attractive and are, or can be, available for commercialization during the next decade. In particular, the entrained-bed processes appear to offer substantial environmental as well as economic advantages owing to their simplicity and lack of by-products. It is felt that development emphasis should be placed on compression, power generation, and heat-transfer equipment, rather than on more gasification processes.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This report presents the results of economic-screening studies for several current and advanced coal-gasification processes coupled with combined-cycle power generation. The objective was to identify whether significant economic and/or environmental incentives exist for using such systems compared to the current practice of direct coal firing and stack-gas cleanup. The processes studied included the Lurgi dry-ash gasifier, the British Gas Corporation Slagger, and three entrained-bed processes offered by Combustion Engineering, Foster Wheeler, and Texaco. All these processes were integrated with combined-cycle plants based on advanced gas turbine technology (2,400/sup 0/F Combustion Outlet) estimated by Westinghouse to be available in the 1981-1985 time period. The evaluations were based on complete ''grass-roots'' facilities sized to conform to present electric utility practice of building units of approximately 1,000-MW capacity. It is concluded that several of the processes considered are potentially attractive and are, or can be, available for commercialization during the next decade. In particular, the entrained-bed processes appear to offer substantial environmental as well as economic advantages owing to their simplicity and lack of by-products. It is felt that development emphasis should be placed on compression, power generation, and heat-transfer equipment, rather than on more gasification processes.

Key concepts: Wood gas generator, Integrated gasification combined cycle, Coal, Combined cycle, Coal gasification, Waste management, Electricity generation, Process engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Economic studies of coal gasification: combined cycle systems for electric power generation. Final report — Research Paper | ScholarLens