2002•Unpublished venueRequires access

Rural transport, accessibility and development

David Simon

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Be that as it may, the modernisation approach would then suggest that poverty could be tackled through interventions which improve access and mobility, either on their own or as part of wider, ‘integrated’ rural development programmes. This is precisely the rationale and justification for numerous investment programmes in rural regions of Third World countries since the 1960s. These have proved particularly attractive to bilateral and multilateral donor organisations because they are very visible and are felt to have relatively rapid and tangible benefits. In addition, road and rail schemes often provide opportunities for civil engineering and other contractors from donor countries and perhaps even export orders for transport equipment. Under such conditions, especially if the aid can be ‘tied’, a significant proportion of the total resources flow back to the donor country or countries, providing an increasingly important economic justification to governments for giving official development assistance in the first place.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Be that as it may, the modernisation approach would then suggest that poverty could be tackled through interventions which improve access and mobility, either on their own or as part of wider, ‘integrated’ rural development programmes. This is precisely the rationale and justification for numerous investment programmes in rural regions of Third World countries since the 1960s. These have proved particularly attractive to bilateral and multilateral donor organisations because they are very visible and are felt to have relatively rapid and tangible benefits. In addition, road and rail schemes often provide opportunities for civil engineering and other contractors from donor countries and perhaps even export orders for transport equipment. Under such conditions, especially if the aid can be ‘tied’, a significant proportion of the total resources flow back to the donor country or countries, providing an increasingly important economic justification to governments for giving official development assistance in the first place.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Be that as it may, the modernisation approach would then suggest that poverty could be tackled through interventions which improve access and mobility, either on their own or as part of wider, ‘integrated’ rural development programmes. This is precisely the rationale and justification for numerous investment programmes in rural regions of Third World countries since the 1960s. These have proved particularly attractive to bilateral and multilateral donor organisations because they are very visible and are felt to have relatively rapid and tangible benefits. In addition, road and rail schemes often provide opportunities for civil engineering and other contractors from donor countries and perhaps even export orders for transport equipment. Under such conditions, especially if the aid can be ‘tied’, a significant proportion of the total resources flow back to the donor country or countries, providing an increasingly important economic justification to governments for giving official development assistance in the first place.

Key concepts: Business, Environmental planning, Geography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Rural transport, accessibility and development — Research Paper | ScholarLens