2003PROCEEDINGS OF 18TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNICAL CONFERENCE ON THE ENHANCED SAFETY OF VEHICLES, HELD NAGOYA, JAPAN, 19-22 MAY 2003Requires access

Crash testing for real-world safety: what are the priorities for casualty reduction?

Pete Thomas, Richard Frampton

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

The introduction of European legislative and consumer crash testing requirements in the late 1990s has resulted in marked changes in the design of vehicle structures and restraint systems. Crash tested vehicles in the range of New Car Assessment Programmes typically show reduced injury assessment values from the dummies and lower levels of intrusion, particularly in frontal impacts. This paper examines real-world accident data to evaluate the changes that have taken place in car performance and the circumstances of injury in order to evaluate what new priorities there are in car occupant protection. Comparisons are made between older cars, built between 1991 and 1996 and newer cars, built up to 2000. The rate of fatal driver injury in newer cars is 24% lower than for the older cars. More car occupants now die in side impacts than in frontal impacts; 27% of these are seated on the far side of the vehicle. The numbers of fatalities in collisions with roadside objects virtually equals those killed in car to car impacts. The collision severities of fatal frontal impacts have not increased. Rear seat-belt use is low amongst fatally or seriously injured rear-seat passengers. For the covering abstract see ITRD E825082.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The introduction of European legislative and consumer crash testing requirements in the late 1990s has resulted in marked changes in the design of vehicle structures and restraint systems. Crash tested vehicles in the range of New Car Assessment Programmes typically show reduced injury assessment values from the dummies and lower levels of intrusion, particularly in frontal impacts. This paper examines real-world accident data to evaluate the changes that have taken place in car performance and the circumstances of injury in order to evaluate what new priorities there are in car occupant protection. Comparisons are made between older cars, built between 1991 and 1996 and newer cars, built up to 2000. The rate of fatal driver injury in newer cars is 24% lower than for the older cars. More car occupants now die in side impacts than in frontal impacts; 27% of these are seated on the far side of the vehicle. The numbers of fatalities in collisions with roadside objects virtually equals those killed in car to car impacts. The collision severities of fatal frontal impacts have not increased. Rear seat-belt use is low amongst fatally or seriously injured rear-seat passengers. For the covering abstract see ITRD E825082.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The introduction of European legislative and consumer crash testing requirements in the late 1990s has resulted in marked changes in the design of vehicle structures and restraint systems. Crash tested vehicles in the range of New Car Assessment Programmes typically show reduced injury assessment values from the dummies and lower levels of intrusion, particularly in frontal impacts. This paper examines real-world accident data to evaluate the changes that have taken place in car performance and the circumstances of injury in order to evaluate what new priorities there are in car occupant protection. Comparisons are made between older cars, built between 1991 and 1996 and newer cars, built up to 2000. The rate of fatal driver injury in newer cars is 24% lower than for the older cars. More car occupants now die in side impacts than in frontal impacts; 27% of these are seated on the far side of the vehicle. The numbers of fatalities in collisions with roadside objects virtually equals those killed in car to car impacts. The collision severities of fatal frontal impacts have not increased. Rear seat-belt use is low amongst fatally or seriously injured rear-seat passengers. For the covering abstract see ITRD E825082.

Key concepts: Crash, Vehicle safety, Seat belt, Engineering, Motor vehicle crash, Transport engineering, Collision, Poison control

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Crash testing for real-world safety: what are the priorities for casualty reduction? — Research Paper | ScholarLens