2002•PubMedRequires access

[Gastric mucosa as a target in duodenogastric reflux: assessment of lesions with the system of indices].

Sergey I. Eremeev, Turilova Ns, В. А. Ахмедов

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

AIM: To characterize gastric mucosa lesion in patients with duodenogastric reflux (DGR) using an original system of indices evaluating general pathological processes in gastric mucosa. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The trial enrolled 109 patients with chronic gastritis (CG) in combination with opisthorchiasis. These were divided into 2 groups: CG patients with DGR (group 1, n = 58), CG patients free of DGR (group 2, n = 51). Thirty patients with chronic acalculous cholecystitis served control. All the patients have undergone fibrogastroduodenoscopy with biopsy from the antral part of the stomach and its body. To detail morphological picture of the gastric mucosa a number of additional indices were used characterizing exudative inflammation, productive inflammation, atrophic, sclerotic, immunopathological, dysregeneratory processes. RESULTS: Semiquantitative analysis of gastric mucosa in chronic opisthorchiasis patients with DGR by the above indices showed a significant prevalence of exudative (p < 0.05) and productive (p < 0.01) inflammations in the antrum over those in the gastric body. Comparison of the indices in the patients with and without DGR revealed significant differences in activity of exudative inflammation (p < 0.05), dysregeneratory (p < 0.05) and atrophic (p < 0.001) processes in gastric antrum and dysregeneratory and atrophic processes in the gastric body (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The indices contribute to more precise assessment of structural shifts occurring in gastric mucosa which is the target for DGR.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

AIM: To characterize gastric mucosa lesion in patients with duodenogastric reflux (DGR) using an original system of indices evaluating general pathological processes in gastric mucosa. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The trial enrolled 109 patients with chronic gastritis (CG) in combination with opisthorchiasis. These were divided into 2 groups: CG patients with DGR (group 1, n = 58), CG patients free of DGR (group 2, n = 51). Thirty patients with chronic acalculous cholecystitis served control. All the patients have undergone fibrogastroduodenoscopy with biopsy from the antral part of the stomach and its body. To detail morphological picture of the gastric mucosa a number of additional indices were used characterizing exudative inflammation, productive inflammation, atrophic, sclerotic, immunopathological, dysregeneratory processes. RESULTS: Semiquantitative analysis of gastric mucosa in chronic opisthorchiasis patients with DGR by the above indices showed a significant prevalence of exudative (p < 0.05) and productive (p < 0.01) inflammations in the antrum over those in the gastric body. Comparison of the indices in the patients with and without DGR revealed significant differences in activity of exudative inflammation (p < 0.05), dysregeneratory (p < 0.05) and atrophic (p < 0.001) processes in gastric antrum and dysregeneratory and atrophic processes in the gastric body (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The indices contribute to more precise assessment of structural shifts occurring in gastric mucosa which is the target for DGR.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

AIM: To characterize gastric mucosa lesion in patients with duodenogastric reflux (DGR) using an original system of indices evaluating general pathological processes in gastric mucosa. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The trial enrolled 109 patients with chronic gastritis (CG) in combination with opisthorchiasis. These were divided into 2 groups: CG patients with DGR (group 1, n = 58), CG patients free of DGR (group 2, n = 51). Thirty patients with chronic acalculous cholecystitis served control. All the patients have undergone fibrogastroduodenoscopy with biopsy from the antral part of the stomach and its body. To detail morphological picture of the gastric mucosa a number of additional indices were used characterizing exudative inflammation, productive inflammation, atrophic, sclerotic, immunopathological, dysregeneratory processes. RESULTS: Semiquantitative analysis of gastric mucosa in chronic opisthorchiasis patients with DGR by the above indices showed a significant prevalence of exudative (p < 0.05) and productive (p < 0.01) inflammations in the antrum over those in the gastric body. Comparison of the indices in the patients with and without DGR revealed significant differences in activity of exudative inflammation (p < 0.05), dysregeneratory (p < 0.05) and atrophic (p < 0.001) processes in gastric antrum and dysregeneratory and atrophic processes in the gastric body (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The indices contribute to more precise assessment of structural shifts occurring in gastric mucosa which is the target for DGR.

Key concepts: Medicine, Gastroenterology, Gastric mucosa, Internal medicine, Antrum, Atrophic gastritis, Biopsy, Stomach

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Gastric mucosa as a target in duodenogastric reflux: assessment of lesions with the system of indices]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens