Procedures for Translating and Evaluating Equivalence of Questionnaires for Use in Cross-Cultural Studies
Amina Abubakar, Radosveta Dimitrova, Byron G. Adams, Venzislav Jordanov, Delia Ștefenel
Abstract
Amina Abubakar, Radosveta Dimitrova, Byron G. Adams, Venzislav Jordanov, Delia Ștefenel
Abstract
Taking into account the increased need to understand human behaviour across different cultural contexts there is a greater need than before to translate scales for use in large scale studies. Valid comparisons across cultures require that the translation process be accurate and that the scales being used measure the same psychological constructs across groups (i.e. measurement invariance). The current paper sets out to highlight the state- of-the-art procedures for translating scales and evaluating their invariance across cultural context. We first highlight the different ways in which item translation can go wrong and then discuss procedures for carrying out the translation process. Second, we discuss the construct of equivalence and then using data from more than 430 participants in 3 countries (Romania, United Kingdom and South Africa) we illustrate how one can evaluate measurement equivalence within a confirmatory factor analysis model. It is expected that the current paper will provide the reader with adequate background information on how to carry out translation of scales.
OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Taking into account the increased need to understand human behaviour across different cultural contexts there is a greater need than before to translate scales for use in large scale studies. Valid comparisons across cultures require that the translation process be accurate and that the scales being used measure the same psychological constructs across groups (i.e. measurement invariance). The current paper sets out to highlight the state- of-the-art procedures for translating scales and evaluating their invariance across cultural context. We first highlight the different ways in which item translation can go wrong and then discuss procedures for carrying out the translation process. Second, we discuss the construct of equivalence and then using data from more than 430 participants in 3 countries (Romania, United Kingdom and South Africa) we illustrate how one can evaluate measurement equivalence within a confirmatory factor analysis model. It is expected that the current paper will provide the reader with adequate background information on how to carry out translation of scales.
Key concepts: Equivalence (formal languages), Measurement invariance, Confirmatory factor analysis, Cross-cultural studies, Scale (ratio), Dynamic and formal equivalence, Construct (python library), Psychology