2008Unpublished venueRequires access

Getting it Right: The Art of Strategy and Operational Warfare

Christopher R. Davis

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract : Today, the U.S. military approaches war as a corporate affair, requiring authoritative guidance to synchronize thought and action. To harmonize diverse activities toward a shared goal, joint doctrine seeks to provide a common perspective for joint, interagency, and multinational efforts. Doctrine, therefore, is the military's link to national political objectives. American military leaders point to the lack of collective doctrine as the culprit for poor performance in World War I. The military transformation that awoke America from its post-Vietnam malaise and forged today's joint force started with doctrine. Its success in harnessing diverse organizational abilities in the quest for national objectives depends on a number of factors; chief among them is providing a sound theoretical underpinning for arranging efforts. Joint doctrine should offer a useful mental model for the application of capabilities across the spectrum of operations and levels of war.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract : Today, the U.S. military approaches war as a corporate affair, requiring authoritative guidance to synchronize thought and action. To harmonize diverse activities toward a shared goal, joint doctrine seeks to provide a common perspective for joint, interagency, and multinational efforts. Doctrine, therefore, is the military's link to national political objectives. American military leaders point to the lack of collective doctrine as the culprit for poor performance in World War I. The military transformation that awoke America from its post-Vietnam malaise and forged today's joint force started with doctrine. Its success in harnessing diverse organizational abilities in the quest for national objectives depends on a number of factors; chief among them is providing a sound theoretical underpinning for arranging efforts. Joint doctrine should offer a useful mental model for the application of capabilities across the spectrum of operations and levels of war.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract : Today, the U.S. military approaches war as a corporate affair, requiring authoritative guidance to synchronize thought and action. To harmonize diverse activities toward a shared goal, joint doctrine seeks to provide a common perspective for joint, interagency, and multinational efforts. Doctrine, therefore, is the military's link to national political objectives. American military leaders point to the lack of collective doctrine as the culprit for poor performance in World War I. The military transformation that awoke America from its post-Vietnam malaise and forged today's joint force started with doctrine. Its success in harnessing diverse organizational abilities in the quest for national objectives depends on a number of factors; chief among them is providing a sound theoretical underpinning for arranging efforts. Joint doctrine should offer a useful mental model for the application of capabilities across the spectrum of operations and levels of war.

Key concepts: Doctrine, Military doctrine, Revolution in Military Affairs, Political science, Multinational corporation, Military strategy, Military science, Public relations

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Getting it Right: The Art of Strategy and Operational Warfare — Research Paper | ScholarLens