1991Aspects of mathematics. ERequires access

Local Geometry of Decoupled Pseudoconvex Domains

Jeffery D. McNeal

Open publisher page 55 citations

Abstract

For any smoothly bounded, strongly pseudoconvex domain Ω in ℂ n , the boundary of a suitable ball in ℂ n locally approximates b Ω near p ∈ b Ω, i.e., their defining functions agree up to 3-jets near p. This approximation is often the first step taken when analyzing various domain dependent functions and operators on Ω (e.g., the Bergman and Szegö kernels, the ∂̄-Neumann operator, Poisson kernels), as it allows certain results on the behavior of the operators (or functions) associated to the ball and various tools of classical analysis to be brought to bear on questions about the behavior of the operators on Ω. See, for instance, [F],[F-S],[P]. When the domain Ω is only weakly pseudoconvex, there is no single model domain which locally approximates b Ω, in any reasonable sense, near some z 0 ∈ b Ω. Moreover, the description of an appropriate approximating domain in terms of analytic information on the defining function is not known in general, even when the Levi form degenerates to finite order. Additionally, even when an approximating domain for b Ω near z 0 ∈ b Ω can be found, its shape may vary greatly from the shape of an approximating domain for b Ω near another z 1 ∈ bΩ, even when z 1 is close to z 0.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

For any smoothly bounded, strongly pseudoconvex domain Ω in ℂ n , the boundary of a suitable ball in ℂ n locally approximates b Ω near p ∈ b Ω, i.e., their defining functions agree up to 3-jets near p. This approximation is often the first step taken when analyzing various domain dependent functions and operators on Ω (e.g., the Bergman and Szegö kernels, the ∂̄-Neumann operator, Poisson kernels), as it allows certain results on the behavior of the operators (or functions) associated to the ball and various tools of classical analysis to be brought to bear on questions about the behavior of the operators on Ω. See, for instance, [F],[F-S],[P]. When the domain Ω is only weakly pseudoconvex, there is no single model domain which locally approximates b Ω, in any reasonable sense, near some z 0 ∈ b Ω. Moreover, the description of an appropriate approximating domain in terms of analytic information on the defining function is not known in general, even when the Levi form degenerates to finite order. Additionally, even when an approximating domain for b Ω near z 0 ∈ b Ω can be found, its shape may vary greatly from the shape of an approximating domain for b Ω near another z 1 ∈ bΩ, even when z 1 is close to z 0.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 55 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

For any smoothly bounded, strongly pseudoconvex domain Ω in ℂ n , the boundary of a suitable ball in ℂ n locally approximates b Ω near p ∈ b Ω, i.e., their defining functions agree up to 3-jets near p. This approximation is often the first step taken when analyzing various domain dependent functions and operators on Ω (e.g., the Bergman and Szegö kernels, the ∂̄-Neumann operator, Poisson kernels), as it allows certain results on the behavior of the operators (or functions) associated to the ball and various tools of classical analysis to be brought to bear on questions about the behavior of the operators on Ω. See, for instance, [F],[F-S],[P]. When the domain Ω is only weakly pseudoconvex, there is no single model domain which locally approximates b Ω, in any reasonable sense, near some z 0 ∈ b Ω. Moreover, the description of an appropriate approximating domain in terms of analytic information on the defining function is not known in general, even when the Levi form degenerates to finite order. Additionally, even when an approximating domain for b Ω near z 0 ∈ b Ω can be found, its shape may vary greatly from the shape of an approximating domain for b Ω near another z 1 ∈ bΩ, even when z 1 is close to z 0.

Key concepts: Domain (mathematical analysis), Bounded function, Ball (mathematics), Mathematics, Boundary (topology), Mathematical analysis, Pure mathematics, Function (biology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Local Geometry of Decoupled Pseudoconvex Domains — Research Paper | ScholarLens