1978OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)Requires access

Maximize octane barrels; adjust reformer charge IBP

Serhat Yanık, R.J. Campagna, B.A. Bricklemyer

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Increasing gasoline octane number by optimizing the front end boiling of the reformer charge was studied. Results show that when evaluated on the basis of the yield and octane of the composite reformate plus straight run gasline stream, an advantage is observed with the n-hexane fraction added to the reformer feed, if octane severity, based on reforming the C/sub 7/ + naphtha, is above 93.5 RON, Clear. This advantage is greater as reformer severities are increased. Below 93.5 RON, Clear, a C/sub 7/ + naphtha appears to be the optimum reformer charge. Further lowering of the boiling range to include the isohexanes fraction results in lower overall gasoline yields except at very high reformer severities. This evaluation was made by using a medium quality mid-continent naphtha as a case study. Poorer quality feeds may show even higher yield benefits when using the nC/sub 6/ + naphtha as reformer charge.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Increasing gasoline octane number by optimizing the front end boiling of the reformer charge was studied. Results show that when evaluated on the basis of the yield and octane of the composite reformate plus straight run gasline stream, an advantage is observed with the n-hexane fraction added to the reformer feed, if octane severity, based on reforming the C/sub 7/ + naphtha, is above 93.5 RON, Clear. This advantage is greater as reformer severities are increased. Below 93.5 RON, Clear, a C/sub 7/ + naphtha appears to be the optimum reformer charge. Further lowering of the boiling range to include the isohexanes fraction results in lower overall gasoline yields except at very high reformer severities. This evaluation was made by using a medium quality mid-continent naphtha as a case study. Poorer quality feeds may show even higher yield benefits when using the nC/sub 6/ + naphtha as reformer charge.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Increasing gasoline octane number by optimizing the front end boiling of the reformer charge was studied. Results show that when evaluated on the basis of the yield and octane of the composite reformate plus straight run gasline stream, an advantage is observed with the n-hexane fraction added to the reformer feed, if octane severity, based on reforming the C/sub 7/ + naphtha, is above 93.5 RON, Clear. This advantage is greater as reformer severities are increased. Below 93.5 RON, Clear, a C/sub 7/ + naphtha appears to be the optimum reformer charge. Further lowering of the boiling range to include the isohexanes fraction results in lower overall gasoline yields except at very high reformer severities. This evaluation was made by using a medium quality mid-continent naphtha as a case study. Poorer quality feeds may show even higher yield benefits when using the nC/sub 6/ + naphtha as reformer charge.

Key concepts: Naphtha, Catalytic reforming, Octane rating, Gasoline, Fraction (chemistry), Octane, Yield (engineering), Materials science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Maximize octane barrels; adjust reformer charge IBP — Research Paper | ScholarLens