2013Yunnan Daxue xuebao. Shehui kexue banRequires access

Study on photosynthetic adaptability of introduced grapevine cultivar in Ningxia area

Yue Guan, Ximeng Li, Zhengzhen Li, Sha Shi, Jinchao Feng

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In order to understand the photosynthetic physiological adaptability,diurnal courses of net photosynthetic rate(Pn),light response curves and CO2 response curves of 2 grapevine cultivars(Vitis vinifera L.and Vitis vinifera L.) were measured by Li-6400 portable photosynthetic system.The results showed that:① The diurnal course of Pn of V.vinifera L.presented a double peak curve with an evidently midday depression in July and August,a single peak curve in June was also observed.By contrast,diurnal course of Pn of V.vinifera L.manifested single peak curve during the whole experimental period.② except for July,the stomatal conductance(Gs),evaporation rate(E) and water use efficiency(EUE) were significantly higher than that of V.vinifera L..③ V.vinifera L.had a higher apparent quantum yield(AQY),whilst Vitis vinifera L.had a higher light saturation point(LSP),light compensation point(LCP),maximum photosynthetic rate(Pnmax) and dark respiration rate(Rd).④ Compare with V.vinifera L.,V.vinifera L.possessed a higher photosynthetic capacity(Amax),CO2 saturation point(CSP),maximum carboxylation rate(Vcmax),maximum electron transportation rate(Jmax) and photorespiration rate(Rp).Base on those observations,we postulated that the V.vinifera L.has a better adaptability and photosynthetic ability than that of V.vinifera L.,which probably indicate its high yield.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In order to understand the photosynthetic physiological adaptability,diurnal courses of net photosynthetic rate(Pn),light response curves and CO2 response curves of 2 grapevine cultivars(Vitis vinifera L.and Vitis vinifera L.) were measured by Li-6400 portable photosynthetic system.The results showed that:① The diurnal course of Pn of V.vinifera L.presented a double peak curve with an evidently midday depression in July and August,a single peak curve in June was also observed.By contrast,diurnal course of Pn of V.vinifera L.manifested single peak curve during the whole experimental period.② except for July,the stomatal conductance(Gs),evaporation rate(E) and water use efficiency(EUE) were significantly higher than that of V.vinifera L..③ V.vinifera L.had a higher apparent quantum yield(AQY),whilst Vitis vinifera L.had a higher light saturation point(LSP),light compensation point(LCP),maximum photosynthetic rate(Pnmax) and dark respiration rate(Rd).④ Compare with V.vinifera L.,V.vinifera L.possessed a higher photosynthetic capacity(Amax),CO2 saturation point(CSP),maximum carboxylation rate(Vcmax),maximum electron transportation rate(Jmax) and photorespiration rate(Rp).Base on those observations,we postulated that the V.vinifera L.has a better adaptability and photosynthetic ability than that of V.vinifera L.,which probably indicate its high yield.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In order to understand the photosynthetic physiological adaptability,diurnal courses of net photosynthetic rate(Pn),light response curves and CO2 response curves of 2 grapevine cultivars(Vitis vinifera L.and Vitis vinifera L.) were measured by Li-6400 portable photosynthetic system.The results showed that:① The diurnal course of Pn of V.vinifera L.presented a double peak curve with an evidently midday depression in July and August,a single peak curve in June was also observed.By contrast,diurnal course of Pn of V.vinifera L.manifested single peak curve during the whole experimental period.② except for July,the stomatal conductance(Gs),evaporation rate(E) and water use efficiency(EUE) were significantly higher than that of V.vinifera L..③ V.vinifera L.had a higher apparent quantum yield(AQY),whilst Vitis vinifera L.had a higher light saturation point(LSP),light compensation point(LCP),maximum photosynthetic rate(Pnmax) and dark respiration rate(Rd).④ Compare with V.vinifera L.,V.vinifera L.possessed a higher photosynthetic capacity(Amax),CO2 saturation point(CSP),maximum carboxylation rate(Vcmax),maximum electron transportation rate(Jmax) and photorespiration rate(Rp).Base on those observations,we postulated that the V.vinifera L.has a better adaptability and photosynthetic ability than that of V.vinifera L.,which probably indicate its high yield.

Key concepts: Compensation point, Photosynthesis, Vitis vinifera, Transpiration, Cultivar, Stomatal conductance, Respiration rate, Horticulture

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Study on photosynthetic adaptability of introduced grapevine cultivar in Ningxia area — Research Paper | ScholarLens