1996Unpublished venueRequires access

For services, rules but few reductions in protection

Will Martin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This is the third of four notes on what the Uruguay Round means for developing countries. The basic principles of the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) are similar to those of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). Both are based on fundamental goals of national treatment (treating imports and domestic supplies equally inside a national market) and most favored nation treatment (nondiscrimination between exporters). In addition, the GATS shares with the GATT a prohibition on the use of quantitative restrictions. It goes beyond the GATT in including specific commitments on market access. The stakes involved in a comprehensive liberalization of trade in services are very high - potentially the same order of magnitude as the gains from liberalizing merchandise trade. And with services trade growing considerably faster, and the remaining protection in the manufactures sector coming down, the gains from liberalizing services trade can only become more important.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This is the third of four notes on what the Uruguay Round means for developing countries. The basic principles of the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) are similar to those of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). Both are based on fundamental goals of national treatment (treating imports and domestic supplies equally inside a national market) and most favored nation treatment (nondiscrimination between exporters). In addition, the GATS shares with the GATT a prohibition on the use of quantitative restrictions. It goes beyond the GATT in including specific commitments on market access. The stakes involved in a comprehensive liberalization of trade in services are very high - potentially the same order of magnitude as the gains from liberalizing merchandise trade. And with services trade growing considerably faster, and the remaining protection in the manufactures sector coming down, the gains from liberalizing services trade can only become more important.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This is the third of four notes on what the Uruguay Round means for developing countries. The basic principles of the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) are similar to those of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). Both are based on fundamental goals of national treatment (treating imports and domestic supplies equally inside a national market) and most favored nation treatment (nondiscrimination between exporters). In addition, the GATS shares with the GATT a prohibition on the use of quantitative restrictions. It goes beyond the GATT in including specific commitments on market access. The stakes involved in a comprehensive liberalization of trade in services are very high - potentially the same order of magnitude as the gains from liberalizing merchandise trade. And with services trade growing considerably faster, and the remaining protection in the manufactures sector coming down, the gains from liberalizing services trade can only become more important.

Key concepts: International trade, Market access, General Agreement on Trade in Services, Trade in services, International economics, Liberalization, Free trade, Trade barrier

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
For services, rules but few reductions in protection — Research Paper | ScholarLens