Making sense of mixed messages: Literacy within the Australian Curriculum
Weijia Lu, Russell Cross
Abstract
Weijia Lu, Russell Cross
Abstract
The Australian Curriculum has a considerable focus on literacy, appearing not only as a core strand within the traditional area of English, but also as a General Capability for the curriculum as a whole. This article examines the meaning of literacy beneath the rhetoric of the curriculum and argues that, despite the claimed messages advocating a functional and critical approach, the suggested message is one emphasising a primary focus on basic skills. Analysing the suite of assessment mechanisms suggested by the Australian Curriculum, we consider inconsistencies between the claimed and suggested messages around literacy.
OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The Australian Curriculum has a considerable focus on literacy, appearing not only as a core strand within the traditional area of English, but also as a General Capability for the curriculum as a whole. This article examines the meaning of literacy beneath the rhetoric of the curriculum and argues that, despite the claimed messages advocating a functional and critical approach, the suggested message is one emphasising a primary focus on basic skills. Analysing the suite of assessment mechanisms suggested by the Australian Curriculum, we consider inconsistencies between the claimed and suggested messages around literacy.
Key concepts: Curriculum, Meaning (existential), Rhetoric, Literacy, Australian Curriculum, Focus (optics), Critical literacy, Pedagogy