2021The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaRequires access

Neural correlates of bilateral summation between natural and vocoded speech

Francis X. Smith, Bob McMurray, Ruth Y. Litovsky, Inyong Choi

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The normal auditory system integrates redundant information across ears, which aids listeners to detect weak sounds. For patients with single sided deafness (SSD), cochlear implants (CI) have been attempted expecting improved speech recognition in challenging listening scenarios. However, it is not yet known whether CI recovers the bilateral summation for weak sound detection in SSD. The binaural benefit of soft-speech recognition was tested in six SSD CI patients and thirty normal hearing (NH) listeners. The task was identifying quietly presented (i.e., RMS ∼6 dB SL) monosyllabic words. CI patients were tested in three conditions: acoustic-ear only (A1), electric-ear only (E1), or both ears (A+E). NH participants were tested in four conditions: monaural natural speech (A1), monaural vocoded speech (E1), dichotic natural and vocoded speech (A+E), or dichotic natural speech (A2). Electroencephalography was recorded during the task. Bilateral conditions (A+E and A2), even when one ear was vocoded, resulted better accuracy than monaural conditions (A1 and E1). However, A+E condition exhibited smaller early auditory cortical responses (i.e., N1P2 complex) than any natural-speech conditions (A2 and even A1). This result may imply that bilateral summation benefits in SSD-CI users are achieved by later cognitive processing rather than immediate early integration.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The normal auditory system integrates redundant information across ears, which aids listeners to detect weak sounds. For patients with single sided deafness (SSD), cochlear implants (CI) have been attempted expecting improved speech recognition in challenging listening scenarios. However, it is not yet known whether CI recovers the bilateral summation for weak sound detection in SSD. The binaural benefit of soft-speech recognition was tested in six SSD CI patients and thirty normal hearing (NH) listeners. The task was identifying quietly presented (i.e., RMS ∼6 dB SL) monosyllabic words. CI patients were tested in three conditions: acoustic-ear only (A1), electric-ear only (E1), or both ears (A+E). NH participants were tested in four conditions: monaural natural speech (A1), monaural vocoded speech (E1), dichotic natural and vocoded speech (A+E), or dichotic natural speech (A2). Electroencephalography was recorded during the task. Bilateral conditions (A+E and A2), even when one ear was vocoded, resulted better accuracy than monaural conditions (A1 and E1). However, A+E condition exhibited smaller early auditory cortical responses (i.e., N1P2 complex) than any natural-speech conditions (A2 and even A1). This result may imply that bilateral summation benefits in SSD-CI users are achieved by later cognitive processing rather than immediate early integration.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The normal auditory system integrates redundant information across ears, which aids listeners to detect weak sounds. For patients with single sided deafness (SSD), cochlear implants (CI) have been attempted expecting improved speech recognition in challenging listening scenarios. However, it is not yet known whether CI recovers the bilateral summation for weak sound detection in SSD. The binaural benefit of soft-speech recognition was tested in six SSD CI patients and thirty normal hearing (NH) listeners. The task was identifying quietly presented (i.e., RMS ∼6 dB SL) monosyllabic words. CI patients were tested in three conditions: acoustic-ear only (A1), electric-ear only (E1), or both ears (A+E). NH participants were tested in four conditions: monaural natural speech (A1), monaural vocoded speech (E1), dichotic natural and vocoded speech (A+E), or dichotic natural speech (A2). Electroencephalography was recorded during the task. Bilateral conditions (A+E and A2), even when one ear was vocoded, resulted better accuracy than monaural conditions (A1 and E1). However, A+E condition exhibited smaller early auditory cortical responses (i.e., N1P2 complex) than any natural-speech conditions (A2 and even A1). This result may imply that bilateral summation benefits in SSD-CI users are achieved by later cognitive processing rather than immediate early integration.

Key concepts: Monaural, Dichotic listening, Binaural recording, Audiology, Speech recognition, Speech perception, Task (project management), Natural (archaeology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Neural correlates of bilateral summation between natural and vocoded speech — Research Paper | ScholarLens