2009•Unpublished venueRequires access

Maritime Security and Oceans Policy

Peter Cozens

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

The negotiators and decision makers at the third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS III) between 1973 and 1982 may not have considered the implications for how coastal states would manage their respective extended maritime zones and what security considerations would arise. They were understandably more concerned with the immediacy of the international strategic problems ahead. The three principal committees of UNCLOS III from 1973 to 1982 were focused on:1 Committee One. The problem of the legal regime of the seabed. 2 Committee Two. The regimes of the territorial sea and contiguous zone, con-tinental shelf, exclusive economic zone, the high seas, and fishing and conservation of the living resources of the high seas, and questions relating to straits and archipelagic states.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The negotiators and decision makers at the third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS III) between 1973 and 1982 may not have considered the implications for how coastal states would manage their respective extended maritime zones and what security considerations would arise. They were understandably more concerned with the immediacy of the international strategic problems ahead. The three principal committees of UNCLOS III from 1973 to 1982 were focused on:1 Committee One. The problem of the legal regime of the seabed. 2 Committee Two. The regimes of the territorial sea and contiguous zone, con-tinental shelf, exclusive economic zone, the high seas, and fishing and conservation of the living resources of the high seas, and questions relating to straits and archipelagic states.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The negotiators and decision makers at the third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS III) between 1973 and 1982 may not have considered the implications for how coastal states would manage their respective extended maritime zones and what security considerations would arise. They were understandably more concerned with the immediacy of the international strategic problems ahead. The three principal committees of UNCLOS III from 1973 to 1982 were focused on:1 Committee One. The problem of the legal regime of the seabed. 2 Committee Two. The regimes of the territorial sea and contiguous zone, con-tinental shelf, exclusive economic zone, the high seas, and fishing and conservation of the living resources of the high seas, and questions relating to straits and archipelagic states.

Key concepts: Archipelagic state, United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Exclusive economic zone, Territorial waters, International waters, Principal (computer security), Political science, Maritime boundary

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Maritime Security and Oceans Policy — Research Paper | ScholarLens