2021Edward Elgar Publishing eBooksRequires access

Case study: reflexive practice in PhD research

Paul Hibbert

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The exploration of doctoral research in Chapter 5 leads to the conclusion that reflexive practices do not need, necessarily, to be understood and named according to a particular scheme in order to go on. However, it also establishes that having a way to recognise and name the reflexive practices in play does help us to be aware of them, even when we are using memory and documentary traces to try to retrieve insights long after the study has been completed. Often the need to demonstrate and give an account of our research reflexivity becomes clear later in the study. With an appropriate framework of reflexive practices to shape a retrospective description, it is possible to give an effective account of reflexivity in the research process, even if the benefits of a more informed, aware, and contemporaneous engagement have been missed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The exploration of doctoral research in Chapter 5 leads to the conclusion that reflexive practices do not need, necessarily, to be understood and named according to a particular scheme in order to go on. However, it also establishes that having a way to recognise and name the reflexive practices in play does help us to be aware of them, even when we are using memory and documentary traces to try to retrieve insights long after the study has been completed. Often the need to demonstrate and give an account of our research reflexivity becomes clear later in the study. With an appropriate framework of reflexive practices to shape a retrospective description, it is possible to give an effective account of reflexivity in the research process, even if the benefits of a more informed, aware, and contemporaneous engagement have been missed.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The exploration of doctoral research in Chapter 5 leads to the conclusion that reflexive practices do not need, necessarily, to be understood and named according to a particular scheme in order to go on. However, it also establishes that having a way to recognise and name the reflexive practices in play does help us to be aware of them, even when we are using memory and documentary traces to try to retrieve insights long after the study has been completed. Often the need to demonstrate and give an account of our research reflexivity becomes clear later in the study. With an appropriate framework of reflexive practices to shape a retrospective description, it is possible to give an effective account of reflexivity in the research process, even if the benefits of a more informed, aware, and contemporaneous engagement have been missed.

Key concepts: Reflexivity, Order (exchange), Process (computing), Epistemology, Computer science, Sociology, Social science, Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Case study: reflexive practice in PhD research — Research Paper | ScholarLens