2021Energy Conversion and Management XOpen access

Bioethanol from Napier grass employing different fermentation strategies to evaluate a suitable operation for batch bioethanol production

Mallika Boonmee Kongkeitkajorn, Rotsarin Yaemdeeka, Irada Chaiyota, Korakoch Hamsupo, Atcha Oraintara, Alissara Reungsang

Open full text 16 citations

Abstract

Napier grass has been used as animal feed especially in countries with tropical climates. As interest in alternative feedstocks for fuel bioethanol increases, Napier grass has been considered as a potential feedstock for lignocellulosic bioethanol production. Two main fermentation strategies, including separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF) and simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF), were investigated with various substrate and enzyme feeding patterns in SSF. Total substrate loading of 15% and enzyme dosage of 40 FPU/gsubstrate were controlled to compare the performance of each fermentation variation. SHF and SSF resulted in similar ethanol production of 30.6 ± 0.4 g/L and 28.5 ± 2.3 g/L. Preincubation of grass and enzyme resulted in significant lower ethanol at 20.3 ± 1.6 g/L. Portioning the addition of grass and enzyme did not change the ethanol production significantly. Increasing the grass loading to 30% via portioning approach resulted in an increase in ethanol production in batch fermentation, while the addition of extra enzyme did not help with increasing ethanol production.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Napier grass has been used as animal feed especially in countries with tropical climates. As interest in alternative feedstocks for fuel bioethanol increases, Napier grass has been considered as a potential feedstock for lignocellulosic bioethanol production. Two main fermentation strategies, including separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF) and simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF), were investigated with various substrate and enzyme feeding patterns in SSF. Total substrate loading of 15% and enzyme dosage of 40 FPU/gsubstrate were controlled to compare the performance of each fermentation variation. SHF and SSF resulted in similar ethanol production of 30.6 ± 0.4 g/L and 28.5 ± 2.3 g/L. Preincubation of grass and enzyme resulted in significant lower ethanol at 20.3 ± 1.6 g/L. Portioning the addition of grass and enzyme did not change the ethanol production significantly. Increasing the grass loading to 30% via portioning approach resulted in an increase in ethanol production in batch fermentation, while the addition of extra enzyme did not help with increasing ethanol production.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Napier grass has been used as animal feed especially in countries with tropical climates. As interest in alternative feedstocks for fuel bioethanol increases, Napier grass has been considered as a potential feedstock for lignocellulosic bioethanol production. Two main fermentation strategies, including separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF) and simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF), were investigated with various substrate and enzyme feeding patterns in SSF. Total substrate loading of 15% and enzyme dosage of 40 FPU/gsubstrate were controlled to compare the performance of each fermentation variation. SHF and SSF resulted in similar ethanol production of 30.6 ± 0.4 g/L and 28.5 ± 2.3 g/L. Preincubation of grass and enzyme resulted in significant lower ethanol at 20.3 ± 1.6 g/L. Portioning the addition of grass and enzyme did not change the ethanol production significantly. Increasing the grass loading to 30% via portioning approach resulted in an increase in ethanol production in batch fermentation, while the addition of extra enzyme did not help with increasing ethanol production.

Key concepts: Biofuel, Fermentation, Ethanol fuel, Raw material, Food science, Hydrolysis, Ethanol, Pulp and paper industry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Bioethanol from Napier grass employing different fermentation strategies to evaluate a suitable operation for batch bioethanol production — Research Paper | ScholarLens