Homer’s Litai: Figurative or Literal? Heraclitus the Allegorist and Clement of Alexandria
Mikołaj Domaradzki
Abstract
Mikołaj Domaradzki
Abstract
The purpose of the present paper is to examine two diametrically opposed interpretations of the Homeric Prayers that were put forward by Heraclitus the Allegorist and Clement of Alexandria. This article shows that these divergent (figurative vs. literal) interpretations reflect not only the conflicting interests of their authors (the glorification of Homer vs. the glorification of Christianity) but also a significant difference between a pagan (polytheistic) and a Christian (monotheistic) attitude to the literal-figurative dimension of personifications.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The purpose of the present paper is to examine two diametrically opposed interpretations of the Homeric Prayers that were put forward by Heraclitus the Allegorist and Clement of Alexandria. This article shows that these divergent (figurative vs. literal) interpretations reflect not only the conflicting interests of their authors (the glorification of Homer vs. the glorification of Christianity) but also a significant difference between a pagan (polytheistic) and a Christian (monotheistic) attitude to the literal-figurative dimension of personifications.
Key concepts: Literal and figurative language, Literal (mathematical logic), Christianity, Literature, Dimension (graph theory), Philosophy, Art, Linguistics