2020The Classical JournalRequires access

Homer’s Litai: Figurative or Literal? Heraclitus the Allegorist and Clement of Alexandria

Mikołaj Domaradzki

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The purpose of the present paper is to examine two diametrically opposed interpretations of the Homeric Prayers that were put forward by Heraclitus the Allegorist and Clement of Alexandria. This article shows that these divergent (figurative vs. literal) interpretations reflect not only the conflicting interests of their authors (the glorification of Homer vs. the glorification of Christianity) but also a significant difference between a pagan (polytheistic) and a Christian (monotheistic) attitude to the literal-figurative dimension of personifications.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The purpose of the present paper is to examine two diametrically opposed interpretations of the Homeric Prayers that were put forward by Heraclitus the Allegorist and Clement of Alexandria. This article shows that these divergent (figurative vs. literal) interpretations reflect not only the conflicting interests of their authors (the glorification of Homer vs. the glorification of Christianity) but also a significant difference between a pagan (polytheistic) and a Christian (monotheistic) attitude to the literal-figurative dimension of personifications.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The purpose of the present paper is to examine two diametrically opposed interpretations of the Homeric Prayers that were put forward by Heraclitus the Allegorist and Clement of Alexandria. This article shows that these divergent (figurative vs. literal) interpretations reflect not only the conflicting interests of their authors (the glorification of Homer vs. the glorification of Christianity) but also a significant difference between a pagan (polytheistic) and a Christian (monotheistic) attitude to the literal-figurative dimension of personifications.

Key concepts: Literal and figurative language, Literal (mathematical logic), Christianity, Literature, Dimension (graph theory), Philosophy, Art, Linguistics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Homer’s Litai: Figurative or Literal? Heraclitus the Allegorist and Clement of Alexandria — Research Paper | ScholarLens