2011ThinkTech (Texas Tech University)Requires access

Is the Jury Still Out?: A Case For the Continued Viability of the American Jury

Judge Jennifer Walker Elrod

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Elrod argues that the jury system remains a vital component of American democracy despite growing criticisms and challenges. The article explores the historical foundations and constitutional significance of juries, emphasizing their role in promoting civic engagement and checking governmental power. It addresses contemporary concerns—such as juror bias, inefficiency, and lack of legal expertise—while presenting reforms that preserve the jury’s core values. Through legal analysis and empirical data, the piece defends juries as both legitimate and adaptable in modern legal contexts. Ultimately, it concludes that rather than being obsolete, the jury system remains an essential mechanism for justice and public participation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Elrod argues that the jury system remains a vital component of American democracy despite growing criticisms and challenges. The article explores the historical foundations and constitutional significance of juries, emphasizing their role in promoting civic engagement and checking governmental power. It addresses contemporary concerns—such as juror bias, inefficiency, and lack of legal expertise—while presenting reforms that preserve the jury’s core values. Through legal analysis and empirical data, the piece defends juries as both legitimate and adaptable in modern legal contexts. Ultimately, it concludes that rather than being obsolete, the jury system remains an essential mechanism for justice and public participation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Elrod argues that the jury system remains a vital component of American democracy despite growing criticisms and challenges. The article explores the historical foundations and constitutional significance of juries, emphasizing their role in promoting civic engagement and checking governmental power. It addresses contemporary concerns—such as juror bias, inefficiency, and lack of legal expertise—while presenting reforms that preserve the jury’s core values. Through legal analysis and empirical data, the piece defends juries as both legitimate and adaptable in modern legal contexts. Ultimately, it concludes that rather than being obsolete, the jury system remains an essential mechanism for justice and public participation.

Key concepts: Jury, Hung jury, Law, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Is the Jury Still Out?: A Case For the Continued Viability of the American Jury — Research Paper | ScholarLens