2021IFAC-PapersOnLineOpen access

Implementing safety features of Industry 4.0 without compromising safety culture

Michael Lees, Monique C. Johnstone

Open full text 18 citations

Abstract

The provision of a safe and healthy workplace is one of the highest responsibilities of both employers and employees. Alongside the ethical aspects, a safe workplace also has a strong correlation to the financial aspects of business performance. In general the journey towards safer workplaces has been neither rapid nor without challenges. However improvements in standards, processes, education, regulations and technology have collectively resulted in strong progress over time. Industry 4.0 promises a significant step-change in industrial operations including improvements to productivity, efficiency, quality and cost. This imminent industrial revolution also has the potential to automate and simplify many aspects of safety and risk management. To date the safety related research and work within Industry 4.0 has largely been developed/proposed in isolated functions and from a ‘technical solution’ perspective with a heavy emphasis on automated monitoring. However safety performance is related to things like human behaviour, psychology and safety culture. This paper highlights the potential of this trajectory to undermine existing safety culture. Key recommendations around a more coherent anthropocentric approach are included. Contemporary estimates for projected market spend on Industry 4.0 vary but are typically in excess of US$150 billion by around 2026. This is all in pursuit of improved performance. If the safety components are not implemented in a manner that retains and supports safety culture then a consequential impact on safety performance could likely impact on other performance measures, which would be the opposite intent of Industry 4.0.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The provision of a safe and healthy workplace is one of the highest responsibilities of both employers and employees. Alongside the ethical aspects, a safe workplace also has a strong correlation to the financial aspects of business performance. In general the journey towards safer workplaces has been neither rapid nor without challenges. However improvements in standards, processes, education, regulations and technology have collectively resulted in strong progress over time. Industry 4.0 promises a significant step-change in industrial operations including improvements to productivity, efficiency, quality and cost. This imminent industrial revolution also has the potential to automate and simplify many aspects of safety and risk management. To date the safety related research and work within Industry 4.0 has largely been developed/proposed in isolated functions and from a ‘technical solution’ perspective with a heavy emphasis on automated monitoring. However safety performance is related to things like human behaviour, psychology and safety culture. This paper highlights the potential of this trajectory to undermine existing safety culture. Key recommendations around a more coherent anthropocentric approach are included. Contemporary estimates for projected market spend on Industry 4.0 vary but are typically in excess of US$150 billion by around 2026. This is all in pursuit of improved performance. If the safety components are not implemented in a manner that retains and supports safety culture then a consequential impact on safety performance could likely impact on other performance measures, which would be the opposite intent of Industry 4.0.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The provision of a safe and healthy workplace is one of the highest responsibilities of both employers and employees. Alongside the ethical aspects, a safe workplace also has a strong correlation to the financial aspects of business performance. In general the journey towards safer workplaces has been neither rapid nor without challenges. However improvements in standards, processes, education, regulations and technology have collectively resulted in strong progress over time. Industry 4.0 promises a significant step-change in industrial operations including improvements to productivity, efficiency, quality and cost. This imminent industrial revolution also has the potential to automate and simplify many aspects of safety and risk management. To date the safety related research and work within Industry 4.0 has largely been developed/proposed in isolated functions and from a ‘technical solution’ perspective with a heavy emphasis on automated monitoring. However safety performance is related to things like human behaviour, psychology and safety culture. This paper highlights the potential of this trajectory to undermine existing safety culture. Key recommendations around a more coherent anthropocentric approach are included. Contemporary estimates for projected market spend on Industry 4.0 vary but are typically in excess of US$150 billion by around 2026. This is all in pursuit of improved performance. If the safety components are not implemented in a manner that retains and supports safety culture then a consequential impact on safety performance could likely impact on other performance measures, which would be the opposite intent of Industry 4.0.

Key concepts: SAFER, Safety culture, Productivity, Risk analysis (engineering), Quality (philosophy), Work (physics), Perspective (graphical), Business

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Implementing safety features of Industry 4.0 without compromising safety culture — Research Paper | ScholarLens