ONTOGNOSEOLOGICAL GROUNDS OF ANTINOMY OF THEORY AND PRACTICE
Stanislav Vital’evich Yurovitskii, Юровицкий Станислав Витальевич
Abstract
Stanislav Vital’evich Yurovitskii, Юровицкий Станислав Витальевич
Abstract
The article dwells upon the notions of theory and practice, their notional area and types of their correlation. The notion of antinomy is defined and the difference between aporia and antinomy is shown. The conclusion about the basic applicability of antinomy to rational cosmology and its inapplicability to rational psychology and rational theology is made. The opposition of theory and practice in gnoseology and in ontology is defined and their possible reversibility is indicated.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The article dwells upon the notions of theory and practice, their notional area and types of their correlation. The notion of antinomy is defined and the difference between aporia and antinomy is shown. The conclusion about the basic applicability of antinomy to rational cosmology and its inapplicability to rational psychology and rational theology is made. The opposition of theory and practice in gnoseology and in ontology is defined and their possible reversibility is indicated.
Key concepts: Antinomy, Opposition (politics), Epistemology, Ontology, Philosophy, Law, Political science, Politics